Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Confirmed! National Dems BACKED INDY CANDIDATE In Kansas Senate Race [View all]

To the surprise of no one, new campaign finance disclosures reveal that a top Democratic PAC gave money in support of independent candidate Greg Orman in this year's Kansas Senate race. The Kansas City Star reported Sunday that Senate Majority PAC, one of the biggest backers of Democratic Senate candidates in the midterms, funneled at least $1.5 million to two other groups that were supporting Orman. The PAC is run by former advisers to outgoing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Senate Majority PAC gave $1.3 million to the Committee to Elect an Independent Senate and $151,000 to Kansans Support Problem Solvers, both of which boosted Orman in his losing campaign against Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS), according to the Star.
"...The money exchange was secret until last weeks reports because they were made on or after Oct. 16, meaning they didnt have to be disclosed until last week. Political interests often exploit that loophole to keep some transactions secret until after the election.
In this case, Reids advisers wanted to keep the donations from public view because they didnt want to fuel the idea that Democrats were backing Orman. That was one of incumbent Republican Sen. Pat Roberts chief arguments against Orman in bright-red Kansas, which was that ideologically the independent was more closely aligned to the Democrats than to Republicans.
Orman had refused to say which party he would caucus with had he won...."
Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/news/government-politics/article4332030.html#storylink=cpy
In this case, Reids advisers wanted to keep the donations from public view because they didnt want to fuel the idea that Democrats were backing Orman. That was one of incumbent Republican Sen. Pat Roberts chief arguments against Orman in bright-red Kansas, which was that ideologically the independent was more closely aligned to the Democrats than to Republicans.
Orman had refused to say which party he would caucus with had he won...."
Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/news/government-politics/article4332030.html#storylink=cpy
The transactions occurred on or after Oct. 16, which meant they were not disclosed under federal campaign finance rules until more than a month after Election Day. National Democrats had been publicly coy during the campaign when describing their intentions for the race, and Orman never publicly pledged to caucus with Democrats if he won. But GOP operatives seized the revelation as a sign of Democratic duplicity. "The fact that Greg Orman is a liberal Democrat isnt shocking, anyone who heard him over the last month of the race reached the same conclusion," Brad Dayspring, a National Republican Senatorial Committee official, told TPM in an email. "It is noteworthy that Majority PAC and other Democrats in Washington tied to Harry Reid repeatedly lied to reporters about their involvement in this race."
Orman's ascendance as the de facto Democratic candidate followed the actual Democratic nominee Chad Taylor dropping out of the race in early September. Taylor's withdrawal came after a conversation with Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), and it is widely assumed that the national party wanted to boost Orman's chances because he was polling better against Roberts than Taylor was. Orman lost to Roberts, 42 percent to 53 percent, last month.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/kansas-senate-race-national-democrats-greg-orman
.
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Unless he becomes NOT one before the Primary...you won't be supporting him on DU...
VanillaRhapsody
Dec 2014
#11
No he hasn't....you are pulling that out of the place the sun don't shine....
VanillaRhapsody
Dec 2014
#13
Had trouble reading that did ya?" Bernie will most likely run as a Democrat, he has said so."
Autumn
Dec 2014
#14
Swarm? Yeah, we wouldn't want to have, like, a discussion on a discussion forum.
wyldwolf
Dec 2014
#26
This wasn't really a secret. Most speculated that Chad Taylor (Dem nominee) dropped out because he
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#2