Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 12:58 PM Dec 2014

Confirmed! National Dems BACKED INDY CANDIDATE In Kansas Senate Race [View all]




To the surprise of no one, new campaign finance disclosures reveal that a top Democratic PAC gave money in support of independent candidate Greg Orman in this year's Kansas Senate race. The Kansas City Star reported Sunday that Senate Majority PAC, one of the biggest backers of Democratic Senate candidates in the midterms, funneled at least $1.5 million to two other groups that were supporting Orman. The PAC is run by former advisers to outgoing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Senate Majority PAC gave $1.3 million to the Committee to Elect an Independent Senate and $151,000 to Kansans Support Problem Solvers, both of which boosted Orman in his losing campaign against Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS), according to the Star.


"...The money exchange was secret until last week’s reports because they were made on or after Oct. 16, meaning they didn’t have to be disclosed until last week. Political interests often exploit that loophole to keep some transactions secret until after the election.

In this case, Reid’s advisers wanted to keep the donations from public view because they didn’t want to fuel the idea that Democrats were backing Orman. That was one of incumbent Republican Sen. Pat Roberts’ chief arguments against Orman in bright-red Kansas, which was that ideologically the independent was more closely aligned to the Democrats than to Republicans.

Orman had refused to say which party he would caucus with had he won...."


Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/news/government-politics/article4332030.html#storylink=cpy


The transactions occurred on or after Oct. 16, which meant they were not disclosed under federal campaign finance rules until more than a month after Election Day. National Democrats had been publicly coy during the campaign when describing their intentions for the race, and Orman never publicly pledged to caucus with Democrats if he won. But GOP operatives seized the revelation as a sign of Democratic duplicity. "The fact that Greg Orman is a liberal Democrat isn’t shocking, anyone who heard him over the last month of the race reached the same conclusion," Brad Dayspring, a National Republican Senatorial Committee official, told TPM in an email. "It is noteworthy that Majority PAC and other Democrats in Washington tied to Harry Reid repeatedly lied to reporters about their involvement in this race."

Orman's ascendance as the de facto Democratic candidate followed the actual Democratic nominee Chad Taylor dropping out of the race in early September. Taylor's withdrawal came after a conversation with Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), and it is widely assumed that the national party wanted to boost Orman's chances because he was polling better against Roberts than Taylor was. Orman lost to Roberts, 42 percent to 53 percent, last month.



http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/kansas-senate-race-national-democrats-greg-orman


.
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Precedence has been set. Thank you Harry Autumn Dec 2014 #1
The precedent of not splitting left-wing votes... SidDithers Dec 2014 #8
Here you go Sid Autumn Dec 2014 #9
"the candidate that has the best chance of defeating the Republican." wyldwolf Dec 2014 #25
Yeah Sid is funny. But please don't combine our posts. Autumn Dec 2014 #27
yeah, he has a great sense of humor. You, on the other hand should play Vegas wyldwolf Dec 2014 #28
Be sure and tip your waitress. Autumn Dec 2014 #29
I stand for Bernie. Do you? Lugano Dec 2014 #31
Unless he becomes NOT one before the Primary...you won't be supporting him on DU... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #11
Hey Vnilla, how goes it? Autumn Dec 2014 #12
No he hasn't....you are pulling that out of the place the sun don't shine.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #13
Had trouble reading that did ya?" Bernie will most likely run as a Democrat, he has said so." Autumn Dec 2014 #14
have trouble reading do ya? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #16
I said he "most likely will" because he said he "most likely will" Autumn Dec 2014 #18
Sanders 'inclined' to run in Democratic primary... Segami Dec 2014 #22
Bernie runs, Hillary might just as well go home. Autumn Dec 2014 #23
LOL!....now you did it.. Segami Dec 2014 #24
Swarm? Yeah, we wouldn't want to have, like, a discussion on a discussion forum. wyldwolf Dec 2014 #26
Many of us do discuss things, important things. Others? Autumn Dec 2014 #30
This wasn't really a secret. Most speculated that Chad Taylor (Dem nominee) dropped out because he okaawhatever Dec 2014 #2
Great! vi5 Dec 2014 #3
Just a guess, there'll be a sound Democratic candidate for President... brooklynite Dec 2014 #5
Some people might Segami Dec 2014 #7
Some people might then be violating TOS brooklynite Dec 2014 #17
Your long knife will have to wait for a distant night. Union Scribe Dec 2014 #20
I'm not purging anyone... brooklynite Dec 2014 #21
I agree I think it's just a guess there'll be a sound Democratic candidate for President... Autumn Dec 2014 #10
the trouble is, of course hfojvt Dec 2014 #15
Does this make Reid a left-leaning independent? wavesofeuphoria Dec 2014 #4
It's all about control, their control of our party. nt bemildred Dec 2014 #6
Why are people blaming or cheering Harry Reid for this? n/t hughee99 Dec 2014 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Confirmed! National Dems ...