Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In the eyes of the World, we are now an outlaw nation. [View all]reorg
(3,317 posts)69. "Russian authorities" assassinate journalists?
And "all the orgs" mentioned in the article in the OP, namely the UN and some NGOs, have "given evidence of this"?
Wow, makes me wonder why Congress needs to pass resolutions urging the President to further increase the funding of CIA-connected propaganda outfits such as "RFE" and "Voice of America".
Here is what the UN Special Rapporteur actually said, on the actual topic at hand, concise and clear, without further distractions:
International law prohibits the granting of immunities to public officials who have engaged in acts of torture. This applies not only to the actual perpetrators but also to those senior officials within the US Government who devised, planned and authorised these crimes.
As a matter of international law, the US is legally obliged to bring those responsible to justice. The UN Convention Against Torture and the UN Convention on Enforced Disappearances require States to prosecute acts of torture and enforced disappearance where there is sufficient evidence to provide a reasonable prospect of conviction. States are not free to maintain or permit impunity for these grave crimes.
It is no defence for a public official to claim that they were acting on superior orders. CIA officers who physically committed acts of torture therefore bear individual criminal responsibility for their conduct, and cannot hide behind the authorisation they were given by their superiors.
However, the heaviest penalties should be reserved for those most seriously implicated in the planning and purported authorisation of these crimes. Former Bush Administration officials who have admitted their involvement in the programme should also face criminal prosecution for their acts.
President Obama made it clear more than five years ago that the US Government recognises the use of waterboarding as torture. There is therefore no excuse for shielding the perpetrators from justice any longer. The US Attorney General is under a legal duty to bring criminal charges against those responsible.
Torture is a crime of universal jurisdiction. The perpetrators may be prosecuted by any other country they may travel to. However, the primary responsibility for bringing them to justice rests with the US Department of Justice and the Attorney General.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
As a matter of international law, the US is legally obliged to bring those responsible to justice. The UN Convention Against Torture and the UN Convention on Enforced Disappearances require States to prosecute acts of torture and enforced disappearance where there is sufficient evidence to provide a reasonable prospect of conviction. States are not free to maintain or permit impunity for these grave crimes.
It is no defence for a public official to claim that they were acting on superior orders. CIA officers who physically committed acts of torture therefore bear individual criminal responsibility for their conduct, and cannot hide behind the authorisation they were given by their superiors.
However, the heaviest penalties should be reserved for those most seriously implicated in the planning and purported authorisation of these crimes. Former Bush Administration officials who have admitted their involvement in the programme should also face criminal prosecution for their acts.
President Obama made it clear more than five years ago that the US Government recognises the use of waterboarding as torture. There is therefore no excuse for shielding the perpetrators from justice any longer. The US Attorney General is under a legal duty to bring criminal charges against those responsible.
Torture is a crime of universal jurisdiction. The perpetrators may be prosecuted by any other country they may travel to. However, the primary responsibility for bringing them to justice rests with the US Department of Justice and the Attorney General.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
If the US don't act, they can babble about bad, bad Putin all day long but nobody will listen.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
116 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Great. Now even a country where journalists get assassinated gets to criticize the US.
DetlefK
Dec 2014
#3
Do the UN, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International "assassinate" journalists?
another_liberal
Dec 2014
#6
The Invasion of Iraq without cause in 2003 was enough proof for me . . .
another_liberal
Dec 2014
#12
The worst was the way they sold Iraq on TV. With Condi Rice's mushroom cloud warning
Enthusiast
Dec 2014
#33
Training the El Salvadorean Death Squads in Honduras back in the early eighties was enough for me
davekriss
Dec 2014
#43
I was young (and naive) enough then to buy into the lies and excuses . . .
another_liberal
Dec 2014
#44
Calls for prosecution from the United Nations, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International . . .
another_liberal
Dec 2014
#17
Do you really think it's possible to "negate" what this report details?
another_liberal
Dec 2014
#18
Really? So someone telling you we don't appreciate Russian propaganda on this site...
randome
Dec 2014
#109
Hey, if you and others are going feel free to indulge in off-topic tangents . . .
another_liberal
Dec 2014
#113
In the eyes of *most americans*, we're an outlaw nation... and proud of it.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2014
#67
Yeah, many still believe anything "Our boys in uniform" do has just got to be justified . . .
another_liberal
Dec 2014
#107
Yes we are, but guess which country's state media arm has the least credibility to say so.
NuclearDem
Dec 2014
#72