Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Offshoring is all about excluding American workers from the job market. Plain and simple. [View all]Romulox
(25,960 posts)52. And yet *you* are the one who shares an economic ideology with rightwing think-tanks CATO and ALEC.
You should probably find a lot to like at the below links!
The members of the International Relations Task Force (IRTF) believe in the power of free markets and limited government to propel economic growth not just in the United States but around the globe. To that end, the IRTF promotes both bilateral and multilateral free trade frameworks, initiatives and partnerships that strengthen the intellectual property rights of our members worldwide and other policies that create and sustain prosperous societies.
http://www.alec.org/task-forces/international-relations/
http://www.alec.org/task-forces/international-relations/
Trade and Foreign Policy
Using trade as a weapon of foreign policy has harmed America's economic interests in the world without advancing national security. The proliferation of trade sanctions in the 1990s has been accompanied by their declining effectiveness. From Cuba to Iran to Burma, sanctions have failed to achieve the goal of changing the behavior or the nature of target regimes. Sanctions have managed only to deprive American companies of investment opportunities and market share and to punish domestic consumers, while hurting the poor and most vulnerable in the target countries.
The powerful connection between economic openness and political and civil freedom provides yet another argument for pursuing an expansion of global trade. In the Middle East, China, Cuba, Central America, and other regions, free trade can buttress U.S. foreign policy by tilling foreign soil for the spread of democracy and human rights.
http://www.cato.org/trade-foreign-policy
Using trade as a weapon of foreign policy has harmed America's economic interests in the world without advancing national security. The proliferation of trade sanctions in the 1990s has been accompanied by their declining effectiveness. From Cuba to Iran to Burma, sanctions have failed to achieve the goal of changing the behavior or the nature of target regimes. Sanctions have managed only to deprive American companies of investment opportunities and market share and to punish domestic consumers, while hurting the poor and most vulnerable in the target countries.
The powerful connection between economic openness and political and civil freedom provides yet another argument for pursuing an expansion of global trade. In the Middle East, China, Cuba, Central America, and other regions, free trade can buttress U.S. foreign policy by tilling foreign soil for the spread of democracy and human rights.
http://www.cato.org/trade-foreign-policy
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Offshoring is all about excluding American workers from the job market. Plain and simple. [View all]
Zalatix
Apr 2012
OP
Professor Norm Matloff's H-1B web page: H-1B work visa is fundamentally about cheap labor
antigop
Apr 2012
#34
In my opinion, the Clintons are probably personally profiting from their business ties
JDPriestly
Apr 2012
#9
Well, technically that is the policy. H1B'rs supposedly provide unique qualifications..
DCBob
Apr 2012
#11
H-1Bs aren't indentured servants. They're paid the prevailing wage & can change employers at will.
leveymg
Apr 2012
#23
Wrong. Once a new petition is filed, an H-1B worker can "port" to his next job.
leveymg
Apr 2012
#25
Are you an H-1B worker or someone with working knowledge of nonimmigrant visas?
leveymg
Apr 2012
#28
The $52K is the lowest of a 4-level wage system - entry level, no exper. $96K is the mean wage paid
leveymg
Apr 2012
#45
Your premise is wrong: US has long enjoyed a net surplus in trade in services, unlike manufacturing
leveymg
Apr 2012
#21
Your graph shows a HUGE loss of manufacturing jobs and a SMALL rise in service jobs
Zalatix
Apr 2012
#32
First part is right - services steady, massive deindustrialization. But, service exports are
leveymg
Apr 2012
#33
Where are the jobs for the tons of Americans who can't get into those few "highly paid" service jobs
Zalatix
Apr 2012
#35
Those manufacturing jobs have been offshored, and the savings pocketed by the 1%
leveymg
Apr 2012
#36
H-1B doesn't discriminate any more than US service workers abroad discriminate against Indonesians.
leveymg
Apr 2012
#38
That article is from June of 2007. Underpayment of H-1Bs has not been a recent, widespread problem.
leveymg
Apr 2012
#56
2007? You think that companies aren't still trying to find cheap labor this way?
Zalatix
Apr 2012
#57
And from the product after they ruin our environment running it to the water to ship it to China.
lonestarnot
Apr 2012
#40
it's a deliberate strip mining of our populous' wealth for the time the elites choose to flee
NuttyFluffers
Apr 2012
#42
OK, we should credit the BNP with coming up with that slogan (at least the British version of it).
pampango
Apr 2012
#44
dispite the saleble words whats it like sharing the same platform as the right?
Sea-Dog
Apr 2012
#51
And yet *you* are the one who shares an economic ideology with rightwing think-tanks CATO and ALEC.
Romulox
Apr 2012
#52