Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

intaglio

(8,170 posts)

1. sounds good but ...

Reply to Fire Walk With Me (Original post)

Mon Apr 23, 2012, 03:17 AM

Apr 2012

There is so much "wiggle room" that law enforcement will just ignore it.

Examples - "lawfully enforce a criminal law or municipal ordinance"; "protect public safety" and the killer "safeguard the privacy of a crime victim or other person" emphasis added.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Cops Would Be Liable Arresting Citizens For Recording Under Approved Conn. Bill [View all] Fire Walk With Me Apr 2012 OP

sounds good but ... intaglio Apr 2012 #1

I agree Meiko Apr 2012 #2

As it stands, "public safety" has been used as an excuse to flush out Zucotti Park of protesters. Selatius Apr 2012 #3

"What the big print giveth, the small print taketh away." AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2012 #4

Useless, too many holes to use as escape from enforcement especially 4 and 5. julian09 Apr 2012 #5