General Discussion

Cosmic Kitten

(3,498 posts)

18. You don't think she wants to go through the hassle of running!?! pfft

Tue Dec 23, 2014, 03:56 PM

Dec 2014

WOW, where did you glean that insight?

Is Ms. Warren tired, haggard, suffering serious
medical concerns and passing out in public???
Is she a tired old woman who has had her
husband cheat on her creating a public embarrassment?
Has she been a corporate layer for one of the worlds worst employers?
Has she been embroiled in tawdry scandals, and suspicious murders?
Has she been caught lying/embellishing the truth about snipers and being "broke"
Has she been courting corporate donors who are destroying the middle class?

Just asking, because that's the tip of the iceberg for Hillary.
Not to mention the right-wing will drub Hillary with every shred
of embarrassing and unflattering "factoid" they can dig up.

Yeah, It's Elizabeth Warren who wouldn't want to go through the hassle of running!
Bwahahaha

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

116 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why EW would accomplish nothing by challenging HRC [View all] VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 OP

I don't think Warren wants to go through the hassle of running. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #1

and integrity..... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #3

You don't think she wants to go through the hassle of running!?! pfft Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #18

Suspicious murders? are you kidding me? Disgusting! hrmjustin Dec 2014 #21

Prepare yourself because the republicans will repete it adnauseum Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #27

We don't need republicans if members here are going to bring up this crap! hrmjustin Dec 2014 #30

Are you whining? It's not crap, it's a preview... Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #37

This is the second time you called Hillary tired and old. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #40

Who else has suffered from blood clots and passed out in public? Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #43

And do you call Warren or Sanders old and tired? hrmjustin Dec 2014 #44

Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #57

Thats a personal attack Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #63

You still never answered my question. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #87

Some people are old before their time... Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #90

As does hillary. Hillary is all over the place! hrmjustin Dec 2014 #91

Hillary does not have good energy or spirit, she's a panderer Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #93

Listen we won't agree so you have a good holiday. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #94

Ok, you too Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #96

As to being "all over the place"... Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #95

If Warren was sitting on a 49 point lead I would suggest Hillary bow out but with Warren sitting Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #83

The polls are meaningless. Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #86

I Warren had any lead you would be excited but she does not. Since Warren has stated Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #107

For someone who repeatedly says she isn't running, 10% is exceptionally high! nt Cal33 Dec 2014 #108

Oh, yea, polls does not matter to some and others deny poll results if it does not fall their way. Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #109

Get used to it Just for Fun Dec 2014 #32

It has no business being peddled here. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #34

Buck up, Camper... Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #41

Did I say I was looking to ban comments. it is just sad you are doing this here. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #42

It's sad to frame the discussion as EW "challenging" Hillary Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #47

I never said a primary should not happen. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #49

But EW has nothing to gain from challenging Hillary??? Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #53

I didn't write the op! hrmjustin Dec 2014 #54

Yeah, you didn't think she wanted to go through the process of running... Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #61

Your opinion, yet you never answered my question on Sanders and Warren. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #62

We went through the same horseshit in 2008. Just for Fun Dec 2014 #55

Um, you posting to me? Cause I'm with you on this? Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #58

I know you're with me. Just for Fun Dec 2014 #59

did you read it....it answers you... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #60

It doesn't matter if it's EW Just for Fun Dec 2014 #64

resistance is futile. MannyGoldstein Dec 2014 #2

Editorial analysis can mean no other thing to the simple-minded. LanternWaste Dec 2014 #6

LOL, you like trying to sound clever. nt Logical Dec 2014 #98

LOL! Politicalboi Dec 2014 #4

obviously you didnt read the article before you posted. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #5

How about you summarize for us so we don't have to click your link? Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #20

how about you read before you post about a link.. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #22

It's your responsibility, your thread. Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #45

is that in the TOS? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #46

We call it a courtesy Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #51

then dont click VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #52

Apparently you don't care to make your point. Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #56

They don't have a point. They just luv the headline. morningfog Dec 2014 #70

you are not the boss of me.. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #71

Fabulous retort Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #75

Wait! Wait! You call it a "responsibility" and then a "courtesty". Two different things. BlueCaliDem Dec 2014 #102

Are those things mutually exclusive? Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #110

Yes. eom BlueCaliDem Dec 2014 #111

"We?" "Us?" "Our?" Bobbie Jo Dec 2014 #114

Alerter whining and smackdown ahead... ProdigalJunkMail Dec 2014 #7

While I kind of agree with the OP's second point ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #8

and the odds were then? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #11

Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #16

ahhhh...so they think everyone that fails to voteis because of that... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #17

Well, I KNOW that telling me ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #25

Better to nominate the last presidential election loser? Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #23

no... better to nominate the most popular candidate VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #26

You still insist on clinging to pathetic polls? Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #33

and Hillary wont be the nominee Just for Fun Dec 2014 #36

poll after poll with 50 point leads say otherwise... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #74

HA HA 50 points... pfft How many people is 50 "points" Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #80

Pffft. You would start a thread like this, lol. closeupready Dec 2014 #9

for the record.. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #10

Do you think the vast majority of DUers give a flying fuck... WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2014 #84

boom AtomicKitten Dec 2014 #100

Maybe she'll think about it while on time-out... WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2014 #101

I'm beginning to understand why this was alerted on Just for Fun Dec 2014 #103

"You take your chances." WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2014 #104

Ah-fuckin-men! (nt) Inkfreak Dec 2014 #115

It's not about what she would accomplish. mmonk Dec 2014 #12

did you read it? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #13

In a way, I am. When Ross Perot received 19 million mmonk Dec 2014 #50

SO your admitting Hillary is no liberal Robbins Dec 2014 #14

it doesnt say that now does it? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #15

She might accomplish a Jeb presidency. ucrdem Dec 2014 #19

Unlike Hillary, she'd give me someone to vote for. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2014 #24

did not read it either did you? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #28

Yes. I did. So? Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2014 #29

sooo? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #31

So, I disagree with the post and its implications that Hillary is the inevitable candidate. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2014 #35

and you are in a small minority who feels that way VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #48

Polls prove nothing. Just for Fun Dec 2014 #66

This article directly addresses that too... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #67

And what exactly was her poll numbers BEFORE her 2008 primaries? Just for Fun Dec 2014 #69

admit it....you did not read it did you? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #72

You never address the 30 point advantage in 2008. nt Logical Dec 2014 #99

And her polls prove it... bwahahaha Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #68

how many do you need? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #77

How could we know since the pollsters don't supply the sample demographics? Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #92

That's OK. I've often been a part of a "small minority". Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2014 #81

In what context? Reading your article doesn't require people to buy a lick of it. TheKentuckian Dec 2014 #39

Well she has said over and over that she is not running. Rex Dec 2014 #38

To sum: Hillary is even more inevitable this time. morningfog Dec 2014 #65

really? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #78

Yes, the analysis was weak. morningfog Dec 2014 #105

See you after Christmas! Lol. morningfog Dec 2014 #106

Posts like this make me want Elizabeth Warren to run more than ever. Kalidurga Dec 2014 #73

If Liz runs, it will be to win. And she will win if she runs. This pulling Hillary to the left is Autumn Dec 2014 #76

Hillary's campaign blather might get pulled to the left. That's about it. n/t djean111 Dec 2014 #89

Why HRC is ewwww and would accomplish nothing. FIFY DesMoinesDem Dec 2014 #79

Your polls don't give you much comfort. benz380 Dec 2014 #82

Aww, locked out of your own thread and... on vacation. WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2014 #85

Resistance is futile. Union Scribe Dec 2014 #88

LOL, you are getting desperate now. Almost begging Warren not to run. Getting scared I can tell. nt Logical Dec 2014 #97

She might be a good sparring partner in the Primaries 1step Dec 2014 #112

I suspect the difference btwn Warren and Clinton would be minimal... brooklynite Dec 2014 #113

Warren isn't married to Bill and she hasn't been Obama's Secretary of State. ucrdem Dec 2014 #116