General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ISIS Says It Will Conquer Europe Soon, Undertake Religious Cleansing And Kill Ruthlessly [View all]stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I was juror #4
On Wed Dec 24, 2014, 11:29 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Did I respond to you?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5999900
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
"butting in where you weren't invited" since when is this 99 Forever's site? This is a discussion board, there was no cause for this rudeness
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Dec 24, 2014, 11:55 AM, and the Jury voted 5-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I didn't realize you owned the website. Completely agree with the other poster - there is no such thing as "butting in" on a forum.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's a message board. Invites aren't necessary to respond anywhere. Still, voting to leave because the alerted post, rude as it is, doesn't violate rules.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I think all comments like this should be hidden. You don't get to choose who responds to you in a discussion forum. That's kind of the whole point. If 99Forever wanted a private discussion with someone, they should have used DUmail or regular email.
I consider a response like this to be rude and outside of what I think should be community standards.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Rude and worthy of a hide. "Butting in when not invited?" Idiot.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.