The presence of "A well regulated militia" in the wording of the Second Amendment [View all]
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by seabeyond (a host of the General Discussion forum).
explains the absence of an acknowledgement of the "infringements" that nearly everyone realizes need to be in place. Thus I have cracked the code of the Second Amendment. In other words, if you wondered as I have why they said "shall not be infringed" knowing full well that infringements were obviously necessary, you need only realize the context, which is that they had already provided the qualifier which was "A well regulated militia". They didn't need to list the necessary infringements because inclusion in a well regulated militia would be predicated upon not having the challenges that would require those infringements. Those who are too young, or who have mental issues, or physical limitations or criminal history, etc, etc, would not make it into a well regulated militia.
= new reply since forum marked as read