Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: All I need to see (St. Louis Shooting) [View all]GGJohn
(9,951 posts)39. Because that's what it is.
What motivates someone to so DESPERATELY hope it isn't a gun in that picture?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
261 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's drawn and pointed , he has a record of carrying an illegal gun and a history of violence
helpmetohelpyou
Dec 2014
#8
You can clearly see that the object he's pointing at the officer is in the shape of a gun.
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#9
thank you for clarifying that it is not that the shape of the gun is what makes you think that but
uppityperson
Dec 2014
#138
There's a post where a DU member froze the screen shot and blew it up a little
helpmetohelpyou
Dec 2014
#12
It is getting weird on DU I've seen stubbornness that the cop must always be wrong
treestar
Dec 2014
#11
Sometimes - and maybe even most of the time - the cop shooting the victim is justified.
Chemisse
Dec 2014
#73
I guess "clearly" means something different to you than it does to me, that is not a clear
uppityperson
Dec 2014
#16
I too have extensive training and experience in the use of firearms, pistol and rifle,
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#23
No problem and I apologize for getting a little too hot under the collar with you,
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#135
FWIW, I think you have been pretty fair in your history on cop issues. You seem to call them out....
Logical
Dec 2014
#120
Apparently, my post count is directly proportional to the likelihood it was a firearm.
_Blue_
Dec 2014
#44
You have nothing to prove because you have nothing to offer in the way of firearms experience
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#34
Yeah, because people always whip out their cellphones, point them at police like a gun
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#56
Based on everything I've read, it is difficult to conclude he was not violent.
Ace Rothstein
Dec 2014
#116
Well, it turns out those of us that said that video showed he was pointing a gun at the officer
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#236
In what neighborhood have there been people killed every time a cop rolls up?
treestar
Dec 2014
#103
Street criminals often don't go to the range working on their stance...nt
Jesus Malverde
Dec 2014
#82
I can't tell what's going on in that clip at all. I don't see how anyone could base a judgement on
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#223
There's been a second angle released that shows what could have been a cell phone
justiceischeap
Dec 2014
#31
Huh? If you look at the video, the 'screen' in the screen cap is a circle of light from a flashlight
X_Digger
Dec 2014
#51
An alternative theory could be that he attempted to fire but failed, in the heat of the moment,
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#131
this is the best angle I've seen, the young man raises phone or gun cop pulls his gun shoots tire wh
juxtaposed
Dec 2014
#137
Did I start a thread EMOTIONALLY insisting it ISNT a gun? no, but that is what we have here
randys1
Dec 2014
#42
Public servants? You mean cops, and certain groups of people can have that luxury
randys1
Dec 2014
#49
I mean that the thousands of people who put their lives on the line to protect others
LincolnsLeftHand
Dec 2014
#71
Well said I agree 100%, if that is how it went down. But there are some here that
doc03
Dec 2014
#58
The body cams and car cams are going to be one fucking huge waste of money. HUGE. n/t
djean111
Dec 2014
#85
Because of recent events, my initial reaction to stories like this is skepticism
tularetom
Dec 2014
#79
How come the police in other civilized countries do not shoot suspects to death even
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#139
So the officer was supposed to wait to see if the guy was going to shoot or not?
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#141
Yeah, in the US that IS the only possible option that occurs to the police. Shoot first, never, ever
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#145
If it was not an ambush, why call it one? Any time someone has "bad intentions", does
uppityperson
Dec 2014
#152
Why don't you show us where in the video the cop jumped out of his car guns ablazing?
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#191
I wasn't referring to this one incident, I was referring to the number of other incidents
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#208
Yes, it was badly written. I was thinking of the other incident, but did conflate the two.
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#214
You may be correct, but I seldom see someone takes such joy in someone dying. Nt
Logical
Dec 2014
#146
A "gun" with a glowing LCD screen? That seems to have disappeared from the crime scene
baldguy
Dec 2014
#220
What is that cop's name and was he tested for steroids or meth after the shooting? - nt
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#187
In case he was operating 'under the influence' during the encounter with
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#192
The fact that he shot first and never asked questions. Doesn't make me think 'he was' (your
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#195
You can tell looking at that video that what you are seeing is a gun in that mans hand.
SomethingFishy
Dec 2014
#224
Gun or not aren't most if not all police shootings found to be justified?
damnedifIknow
Dec 2014
#230
That CLEARLY negates all the unarmed black kids murdered by cops, now doesn't it?
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#237
So you don't believe the several witnesses, again, including the guy who was with him
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#251
You know as well as I do that facts won't matter if the person doesn't want them.
Action_Patrol
Dec 2014
#256