Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: All I need to see (St. Louis Shooting) [View all]uppityperson
(116,002 posts)138. thank you for clarifying that it is not that the shape of the gun is what makes you think that but
that the pose is "exactly how you would point a gun at someone".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
261 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's drawn and pointed , he has a record of carrying an illegal gun and a history of violence
helpmetohelpyou
Dec 2014
#8
You can clearly see that the object he's pointing at the officer is in the shape of a gun.
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#9
thank you for clarifying that it is not that the shape of the gun is what makes you think that but
uppityperson
Dec 2014
#138
There's a post where a DU member froze the screen shot and blew it up a little
helpmetohelpyou
Dec 2014
#12
It is getting weird on DU I've seen stubbornness that the cop must always be wrong
treestar
Dec 2014
#11
Sometimes - and maybe even most of the time - the cop shooting the victim is justified.
Chemisse
Dec 2014
#73
I guess "clearly" means something different to you than it does to me, that is not a clear
uppityperson
Dec 2014
#16
I too have extensive training and experience in the use of firearms, pistol and rifle,
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#23
No problem and I apologize for getting a little too hot under the collar with you,
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#135
FWIW, I think you have been pretty fair in your history on cop issues. You seem to call them out....
Logical
Dec 2014
#120
Apparently, my post count is directly proportional to the likelihood it was a firearm.
_Blue_
Dec 2014
#44
You have nothing to prove because you have nothing to offer in the way of firearms experience
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#34
Yeah, because people always whip out their cellphones, point them at police like a gun
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#56
Based on everything I've read, it is difficult to conclude he was not violent.
Ace Rothstein
Dec 2014
#116
Well, it turns out those of us that said that video showed he was pointing a gun at the officer
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#236
In what neighborhood have there been people killed every time a cop rolls up?
treestar
Dec 2014
#103
Street criminals often don't go to the range working on their stance...nt
Jesus Malverde
Dec 2014
#82
I can't tell what's going on in that clip at all. I don't see how anyone could base a judgement on
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#223
There's been a second angle released that shows what could have been a cell phone
justiceischeap
Dec 2014
#31
Huh? If you look at the video, the 'screen' in the screen cap is a circle of light from a flashlight
X_Digger
Dec 2014
#51
An alternative theory could be that he attempted to fire but failed, in the heat of the moment,
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#131
this is the best angle I've seen, the young man raises phone or gun cop pulls his gun shoots tire wh
juxtaposed
Dec 2014
#137
Did I start a thread EMOTIONALLY insisting it ISNT a gun? no, but that is what we have here
randys1
Dec 2014
#42
Public servants? You mean cops, and certain groups of people can have that luxury
randys1
Dec 2014
#49
I mean that the thousands of people who put their lives on the line to protect others
LincolnsLeftHand
Dec 2014
#71
Well said I agree 100%, if that is how it went down. But there are some here that
doc03
Dec 2014
#58
The body cams and car cams are going to be one fucking huge waste of money. HUGE. n/t
djean111
Dec 2014
#85
Because of recent events, my initial reaction to stories like this is skepticism
tularetom
Dec 2014
#79
How come the police in other civilized countries do not shoot suspects to death even
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#139
So the officer was supposed to wait to see if the guy was going to shoot or not?
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#141
Yeah, in the US that IS the only possible option that occurs to the police. Shoot first, never, ever
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#145
If it was not an ambush, why call it one? Any time someone has "bad intentions", does
uppityperson
Dec 2014
#152
Why don't you show us where in the video the cop jumped out of his car guns ablazing?
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#191
I wasn't referring to this one incident, I was referring to the number of other incidents
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#208
Yes, it was badly written. I was thinking of the other incident, but did conflate the two.
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#214
You may be correct, but I seldom see someone takes such joy in someone dying. Nt
Logical
Dec 2014
#146
A "gun" with a glowing LCD screen? That seems to have disappeared from the crime scene
baldguy
Dec 2014
#220
What is that cop's name and was he tested for steroids or meth after the shooting? - nt
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#187
In case he was operating 'under the influence' during the encounter with
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#192
The fact that he shot first and never asked questions. Doesn't make me think 'he was' (your
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#195
You can tell looking at that video that what you are seeing is a gun in that mans hand.
SomethingFishy
Dec 2014
#224
Gun or not aren't most if not all police shootings found to be justified?
damnedifIknow
Dec 2014
#230
That CLEARLY negates all the unarmed black kids murdered by cops, now doesn't it?
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#237
So you don't believe the several witnesses, again, including the guy who was with him
GGJohn
Dec 2014
#251
You know as well as I do that facts won't matter if the person doesn't want them.
Action_Patrol
Dec 2014
#256
