Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Warpy

(114,547 posts)

3. The dog was clearly suffering

Reply to 840high (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 27, 2014, 02:06 AM

Dec 2014

because diet doesn't cure cancer.

I'm just wondering why the original owner didn't have the cops just return the dog to him.

Whether or not the outcome would have been any different is not up for debate. With that kind of cancer, it was a matter of time.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Guilty - woman took terminally ill neighbors dog & had him euthanized [View all] Liberal_in_LA Dec 2014 OP

There are some real sick people in the world. Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 #1

Why did the vet sgree to do this? 840high Dec 2014 #2

The dog was clearly suffering Warpy Dec 2014 #3

the title doesn't read well. the owner had cancer , NOT the dog. maximillian1974 Dec 2014 #4

Dog did not have cancer. 840high Dec 2014 #5

Bizarre story - TBF Dec 2014 #6