Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING. AT LEAST 10 DEATH IN PARIS SHOOTING. [View all]KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)192. Please allow me to revise my request: Can we simply agree that, had France not
colonized the Middle East before and after 1918, there would be no ongoing casus belli?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
266 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The magazine is like a sophisticated CRACKED or MAD Magazine, with a socio-political bent.
MADem
Jan 2015
#2
You need to stop looking for a "gotcha" moment and actually READ what people write.
MADem
Jan 2015
#26
Try reading the sentence BEFORE that one, why don't you? There's no "ambiguity' if you READ.
MADem
Jan 2015
#45
Ha, ha--yet another insult/accusation/attack! Is that the only way you can converse?
MADem
Jan 2015
#72
No, I think YOU need to do the looking back--you didn't "simply ask a question" -- you accused and
MADem
Jan 2015
#133
Gee, you think asking rather than accusing would be a better way to go, rather than suggesting that
MADem
Jan 2015
#175
That's only if you think the "Muslim push-back" was a reference to the sentence immediately
pnwmom
Jan 2015
#198
Yes, exactly--at a risk of inciting a kerfluffle, it's that "privilege" thing at work.
MADem
Jan 2015
#134
Here is a third person misunderstanding your meaning. Maybe you should change your post
pnwmom
Jan 2015
#160
Well, it's a spit decision. It's perfectly clear at this stage, but thanks for your input.
MADem
Jan 2015
#172
No--in this case, the poster accused me of endorsing slaughter. I didn't take it well.
MADem
Jan 2015
#197
I agree that often the word "so" followed by a question ends in an insulting conclusion --
pnwmom
Jan 2015
#200
Oh, those poor French. You know, maybe if France hadn't invaded and occupied parts of North Africa
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#52
The person to whom I responded asserted that the French were "under attack
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#99
Let me be clear: pissing and moaning that the French are 'under attack by Muslims' represents
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#106
And the post that spawned your subthread said that France was under attack by Muslims
KittyWampus
Jan 2015
#146
So you're ok with this attack because the French are, in your words, MUCKING AROUND IN SYRIA?
GGJohn
Jan 2015
#124
No one is suggesting that this attack is "OK." Why in hell do all conversations on DU devolve to
MADem
Jan 2015
#190
"An eye for an eye" means nothing to these murderers. There is no sense of balance in their minds.
randome
Jan 2015
#144
I think what Twain's narrator was getting at in that passage I cited is that people get
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#214
For your ongoing amusement, you might find the following article of interest:
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#103
It's been quite some time since I paid close attention to internal French affairs. I remember the
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#141
Bollocks - of course #52 was to try to excuse/provide a reason for the attack
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2015
#168
Bollocks back at ya. I take it then you agree with post #42 that spawned this
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#169
I don't particularly agree with that analysis, but it's true that there have been
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2015
#173
Sigh. Can we at least agree that, had the French not stuck their noses into the Middle East after
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#177
Please allow me to revise my request: Can we simply agree that, had France not
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#192
Point of information: AOL is now reporting that the 3 arrested were all
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#249
All 3 were of Algerian descent, according to AOL. One is entitled to ask just how and why it
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#257
I have changed and updated that in line with current info; but even so, all of them were born long
LeftishBrit
Jan 2015
#260
Yes, I saw a report in passing (can't remember where now) that one of the 3 said he
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#261
This has nothing to do with Algeria; it is some insane religious nutcases on a murderous rampage
LeftishBrit
Jan 2015
#251
They may be "insane religious nutcases on a murderous rampage," but AOL is reporting
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#253
For over 300 years, the N. African Moslem caliphates murdered and enslaved thousands
aint_no_life_nowhere
Jan 2015
#250
I'll let Sir Winston Churchill respond to your "poor murdering Arabs" line:
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#252
And there are many, MANY Muslims who will suffer in France because of those assholes, who have not
MADem
Jan 2015
#53
This is the rhetoric that Far-Right Politicians in pretty much every European country use
KittyWampus
Jan 2015
#143
I certainly hope there is more push-back from the remaining Charlie Hebdo staff
GoneOffShore
Jan 2015
#256
Terrorism is terrorism and guess who are the ones doing it. This time over a cartoon. Those
demosincebirth
Jan 2015
#262
The ones doing it are lunatics--but "Islam" doesn't, in and of itself, breed them.
MADem
Jan 2015
#265
Since France was the original (European) imperial power to occupy Vietnam, I can think of
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#49
When I worked at the Wall I met a visitor who had been a French paratrooper in VN
pinboy3niner
Jan 2015
#64
Do you remember if he was French Foreign Legion or regular French Army? As imperial
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#217
U.N.C.L.E.: the ficticious United Nations Command for Law and Enforcement
HereSince1628
Jan 2015
#117
A quibble: 'local hour' doesn't really mean anything except to you. Wherever you are.
randome
Jan 2015
#5
Every French magazine and newspaper should run satirical cartoons about Mohammed as a response
dissentient
Jan 2015
#7
But the magazine is targeted for failing to observe Islamic rules about what may be said!
Yo_Mama
Jan 2015
#46
Taunting them should be the least they should do, these despicable terrorists need to be hunted
dissentient
Jan 2015
#21
I'm getting really tired of these insane Islamic terrorists attacking Australia, France and the
dissentient
Jan 2015
#30
You make a lot of cogent arguments, America has increased the world supply of terrorists, on
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#110
Much as the super secret plan Cracked Magazine was involved in during 2010
LanternWaste
Jan 2015
#114
Western muslims who support the Syrian rebels also support sharia law in the west.
CJCRANE
Jan 2015
#136
these terrorists don't give a shit about fucked up things we have done like torture
JI7
Jan 2015
#235
There were three recent "Allahu Akbar" incidents in France in which drivers attacked pedestrians
Yo_Mama
Jan 2015
#51
These aren't "Muslims." These are extremist nuts. They're no more "Muslim" than the idiots who
MADem
Jan 2015
#77
However, nilesobek talked about 'enforcing their own laws', which implies a Muslim community
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2015
#165
I ASKED. I think you maybe need to look up "strawman" because I didn't build one at all.
MADem
Jan 2015
#211
What are you saying? Please be VERY specific. Are you actually trying to suggest that the conduct
MADem
Jan 2015
#187
Where did they get the idea that images of this muhammad guy are offensive?
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#184
From the same fundie places where the whole prohibition against "graven images" comes...
MADem
Jan 2015
#185
I know people who identify as Christians, Muslims and Jews who haven't memorized anything.
MADem
Jan 2015
#219
But it seems like Middle Eastern culture is much MORE wrapped up in religion than ours.
randome
Jan 2015
#203
But Islamic "trappings" just HAVE to have great import? See where you are culture blind?
MADem
Jan 2015
#218
Of course I can't tell that the new Mrs. Clooney is Muslim. She doesn't wear the clothes 24/7.
randome
Jan 2015
#236
They're no more "Muslim" than the idiots who murder abortion providing doctors are "Christian."
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2015
#216
Horrific--that poor policeman, if he'd played dead he might have gotten through.
MADem
Jan 2015
#104
Thank you for posting that. Hard to watch, but glad I did. RIP to the officer. nt
kelly1mm
Jan 2015
#163
This is how they respond to concerns about their beliefs being cast in an unfavorable light?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2015
#69
It seems to have been a very targeted attack bent on frightening people into submission.
Yo_Mama
Jan 2015
#78
I think you are onto something here, as this cycle of irredentist violence (where
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#206
Well, George Bush and Dick Cheney loudly proclaimed their faith as they fomented illegal war,
msanthrope
Jan 2015
#120
Paris is bracing for the possibility of more attacks. It may not be over. nt
msanthrope
Jan 2015
#122
Cause enough horror and carnage and no one thinks, "I need to go after these guys."
randome
Jan 2015
#153
You mean the German far right parties whose members have benefitted hugely from Muslims
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#220