Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: OK, Warrrenistas. You've had your little fun. [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)57. Hmm. Summers, the Harvard President who claimed females had less aptitude in science and
engineering than males and that, rather than biases like his, were the reason women were underrepresented in universities in those fields. Will the Party that made so much of the "war on women" just ahead of the 2012 Presidential is going to take his word on Warren?
On January 14, 2005, Harvard President Lawrence Summers said that the underrepresentation of female scientists at top universities may be in part due to natural differences between men and women.
Why does this matter? Well, it looks as if Summers, who served in the Obama White House as director of the National Economic Council until the end of 2010, may be the front-runner to succeed Ben Bernanke at the Federal Reserve Board. That's based off new reporting from The Washington Post's Ezra Klein. A source close to Obama told The New York Times' John Harwood that Summers "should be" the choice to lead the Fed.
Alarms are already beginning to go off. The feminist advocacy group UltraViolet issued a statement Tuesday night saying, "Women will not soon forget if President Obama picks Mr. Summers." Some, including UltraViolet, are particularly peeved because for months the presumed front-runner was a woman, Janet Yellen. David Dayen at Salon has a story up Wednesday morning headlined "Sexist Larry Summers Will Destroy the Economy." That story also reports that the White House is leaning toward Summers. On Twitter, Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore.; called the potential pick "disconcerting."
http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/what-potential-fed-front-runner-lawrence-summers-said-about-women-20130724
As we know, Yellen got that slot. Janet Yellen, first female to hold the position. Probably just coincidences.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I want Elizabeth Warren in the White House so that creeps like Summers and Weiss don't even
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#29
A Senator has more power than the President...and still no sarcasm emoticon?
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#37
Wow, there seems to be a rash of posters clamoring for Sen Warren to stay in the Senate.
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#41
Food for thought: Third Way really took hold after Bubba was elected President.
merrily
Jan 2015
#51
I often wonder what Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy, and Lyndon Johnson could have accomplished
Art_from_Ark
Jan 2015
#16
Luckily, fate (or voting machines) saved Kerry from making that same mistake, yet,
merrily
Jan 2015
#52
Hahaha! True, she won't be able to stop those terrible presidential appointments as president.
pa28
Jan 2015
#21
"The 99% will not be served, thanks to Professor Warren!" - Yeah! Now how are we to pass the TPP?
Veilex
Jan 2015
#23
Hmm. Summers, the Harvard President who claimed females had less aptitude in science and
merrily
Jan 2015
#57
"A unicorn in every pot." It is well known that unicorns went extinct on Noah's Ark
tclambert
Jan 2015
#73
Yeah you Warrrenistas. Time to STFU and vote Hillary, for only she can properly impoverish us
Katashi_itto
Jan 2015
#77