Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This just in.....Elizabeth Warren is STILL not running for President [View all]still_one
(98,883 posts)16. That doesn't mean she won't run if the moon is full and the planets are aligned in just the right
Way. She didn't say anything about that so it is still possible
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
170 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This just in.....Elizabeth Warren is STILL not running for President [View all]
brooklynite
Jan 2015
OP
Seems that those that are scared that Sen Warren might just run and kick some booty,
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#49
If it doesn't matter what DEmocrat wins the primary, why are you working so very hard
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#64
We all clearly understand. My question stands. Why do you go on and on about it.
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#108
Glad you noticed. We do not want H. Cinton-Sachs. She sold her soul to Bush in 2002.
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#116
I totally agree. But when people are obsessed with trying to convince others that
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#63
Yes maybe once, but almost once a day, someone tells us that Sen Warren Really, Really, isn't
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#80
So the next time Manny publishes something about Warren (like today!), he's being obsessed?
brooklynite
Jan 2015
#84
Why do we bring Manny into this discussion? Why would we be questioning his mental state?
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#86
That "someone" telling us that Senator Warren is not going to run is Senator Warren, herself.
MADem
Jan 2015
#141
This thread is a good example. Those of you that say you don't care seem to go
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#106
Reporting that Warren will not run is not tantamount to supporting Clinton.
totodeinhere
Jan 2015
#121
You take her at her word. Good for you. She can change her mind, don't you agree? nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#122
What's interesting is that they say they will support any and all Democrats
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#163
I am promoting Sen Warren but far from obsessed. I am obsessed with turning
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#169
What Democrats are on Democratic Underground that are running for President are the
Autumn
Jan 2015
#48
Just so you know... there are many Democrats here on DU that will tell you just where
Autumn
Jan 2015
#62
Nonsense. I belonged to a Union for years, being a Democrat is not the same thing. Hell some
Autumn
Jan 2015
#94
Here's where I'm coming from, most members in both of our parties are very beholden
Autumn
Jan 2015
#52
I am disappointed that this is something so difficult for some to comprehend.
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#66
I am disappointed that this is something so difficult for some to comprehend.
brooklynite
Jan 2015
#70
So what. What is so important that we know right now? Will we still love her if she changes her
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#83
I don't care if she is lying, she is far better than H. Clinton that turned her back
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#109
and yet some here think there is wiggle-room in that statement because she didn't include the word
pkdu
Jan 2015
#2
Ugh. That would be nothing but pandering for votes, and then Warren would be sent to
djean111
Jan 2015
#34
Met too. Imagine listening to someone who has a RECORD of standing up for the things he talks about
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#30
That doesn't mean she won't run if the moon is full and the planets are aligned in just the right
still_one
Jan 2015
#16
If "he will laregly be ignored except for those on left who can see the truth"...
brooklynite
Jan 2015
#40
Hillary still needs to win votes. If she wins the nomination that means she will have convinced
NYC Liberal
Jan 2015
#113
The grassroots are center-left, moderates, but most of Washington the DC Democrats are center-right
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#61
It's difficult because, as we can see here in DU, some are afraid to venture away
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#74
If Bernie joins the party and enters the primary, it will be good for he party.
Agnosticsherbet
Jan 2015
#79
notice the use of 'still.' It means she won't sit still. Meaning she's actually running
wyldwolf
Jan 2015
#47
Some are afraid of Sen Warren. They fear that the crazy left will ask for a pony
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#72
Isn't there an axiom that states that people will vote for a real Republican before they
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#111
I think you are obligated to support her if she is the nominee. Just sayin'. nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#112
Oh, I think you may have to take that pledgey thing and then send your mail-in ballot
djean111
Jan 2015
#152
This just in: Hillary STILL not running for President either. Almost no Dem is.
merrily
Jan 2015
#129
Then the Party should have been beating the bushes for great candidates these last few years,
merrily
Jan 2015
#137
Some won't believe until Chevy Chase tells them with Garret Morris interpreting
csziggy
Jan 2015
#170