Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This just in.....Elizabeth Warren is STILL not running for President [View all]NYC Liberal
(20,450 posts)110. Warren thinks Hillary is terrific. And supports her run.
So I can absolutely see two strong, progressive women running together. It would be quite a formidible ticket.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
170 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This just in.....Elizabeth Warren is STILL not running for President [View all]
brooklynite
Jan 2015
OP
Seems that those that are scared that Sen Warren might just run and kick some booty,
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#49
If it doesn't matter what DEmocrat wins the primary, why are you working so very hard
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#64
We all clearly understand. My question stands. Why do you go on and on about it.
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#108
Glad you noticed. We do not want H. Cinton-Sachs. She sold her soul to Bush in 2002.
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#116
I totally agree. But when people are obsessed with trying to convince others that
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#63
Yes maybe once, but almost once a day, someone tells us that Sen Warren Really, Really, isn't
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#80
So the next time Manny publishes something about Warren (like today!), he's being obsessed?
brooklynite
Jan 2015
#84
Why do we bring Manny into this discussion? Why would we be questioning his mental state?
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#86
That "someone" telling us that Senator Warren is not going to run is Senator Warren, herself.
MADem
Jan 2015
#141
This thread is a good example. Those of you that say you don't care seem to go
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#106
Reporting that Warren will not run is not tantamount to supporting Clinton.
totodeinhere
Jan 2015
#121
You take her at her word. Good for you. She can change her mind, don't you agree? nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#122
What's interesting is that they say they will support any and all Democrats
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#163
I am promoting Sen Warren but far from obsessed. I am obsessed with turning
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#169
What Democrats are on Democratic Underground that are running for President are the
Autumn
Jan 2015
#48
Just so you know... there are many Democrats here on DU that will tell you just where
Autumn
Jan 2015
#62
Nonsense. I belonged to a Union for years, being a Democrat is not the same thing. Hell some
Autumn
Jan 2015
#94
Here's where I'm coming from, most members in both of our parties are very beholden
Autumn
Jan 2015
#52
I am disappointed that this is something so difficult for some to comprehend.
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#66
I am disappointed that this is something so difficult for some to comprehend.
brooklynite
Jan 2015
#70
So what. What is so important that we know right now? Will we still love her if she changes her
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#83
I don't care if she is lying, she is far better than H. Clinton that turned her back
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#109
and yet some here think there is wiggle-room in that statement because she didn't include the word
pkdu
Jan 2015
#2
Ugh. That would be nothing but pandering for votes, and then Warren would be sent to
djean111
Jan 2015
#34
Met too. Imagine listening to someone who has a RECORD of standing up for the things he talks about
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#30
That doesn't mean she won't run if the moon is full and the planets are aligned in just the right
still_one
Jan 2015
#16
If "he will laregly be ignored except for those on left who can see the truth"...
brooklynite
Jan 2015
#40
Hillary still needs to win votes. If she wins the nomination that means she will have convinced
NYC Liberal
Jan 2015
#113
The grassroots are center-left, moderates, but most of Washington the DC Democrats are center-right
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#61
It's difficult because, as we can see here in DU, some are afraid to venture away
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#74
If Bernie joins the party and enters the primary, it will be good for he party.
Agnosticsherbet
Jan 2015
#79
notice the use of 'still.' It means she won't sit still. Meaning she's actually running
wyldwolf
Jan 2015
#47
Some are afraid of Sen Warren. They fear that the crazy left will ask for a pony
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#72
Isn't there an axiom that states that people will vote for a real Republican before they
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#111
I think you are obligated to support her if she is the nominee. Just sayin'. nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#112
Oh, I think you may have to take that pledgey thing and then send your mail-in ballot
djean111
Jan 2015
#152
This just in: Hillary STILL not running for President either. Almost no Dem is.
merrily
Jan 2015
#129
Then the Party should have been beating the bushes for great candidates these last few years,
merrily
Jan 2015
#137
Some won't believe until Chevy Chase tells them with Garret Morris interpreting
csziggy
Jan 2015
#170