Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
29. There it is.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 11:34 PM
Jan 2015

Truth.

You can't make friends by killing people. Same goes for peace. But, when money is more important than, there's going to be a lot of death. Been pretty constant in Iraq since 1980.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

and I should care what Noam Chomsky thinks because...? brooklynite Jan 2015 #1
because he is a highly intelligent and studied thinker on the left G_j Jan 2015 #3
Yup. This^^ elias49 Jan 2015 #4
Do you care what Human Rights Watch thinks? RiverLover Jan 2015 #5
Not QUITE the same as accusing the Obama Administration of terrorism. brooklynite Jan 2015 #6
It can be voiced aloud or inferred by reason, why is one more offensive than the other? nt RiverLover Jan 2015 #7
Terrorism: the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes. brooklynite Jan 2015 #8
The fact is that they are killing hundreds of civilians. Fearless Jan 2015 #33
That may be an undesirable result, but that's not terrorism. brooklynite Jan 2015 #36
9/11 Fearless Jan 2015 #37
If they have the effect of terrorizing civilians, then they are a form of terrorism. Ken Burch Jan 2015 #40
I always wonder about this conclusion Telcontar Jan 2015 #51
It's a different world now Fearless Jan 2015 #65
You self-evidently do care. JackRiddler Jan 2015 #9
Why should you care what anyone thinks...... daleanime Jan 2015 #21
Perhaps so, but that's not what I was asked to do... brooklynite Jan 2015 #22
No such request was made.... daleanime Jan 2015 #28
Is that question an indicatation that you are not familiar with Chomsky, LiberalAndProud Feb 2015 #66
I'm generally familiar with Chomsky... brooklynite Feb 2015 #67
Wow BeyondGeography Jan 2015 #2
it's not terrorism when american presidents slaughter wedding parties and families nt msongs Jan 2015 #10
Of course. Especially a Dem. 840high Jan 2015 #34
I'm not comfortable at all with remote control murder elias49 Jan 2015 #11
"If China was using drones for targeted killing.... EX500rider Jan 2015 #19
Good heavens! You think those countries want our drones? elias49 Jan 2015 #20
They are definitely there with permission. EX500rider Jan 2015 #24
Talk about two faced JonLP24 Jan 2015 #27
pretty weak for Chomsky arely staircase Jan 2015 #12
Chomsky ONLY cares when leftynyc Jan 2015 #43
"the most extreme terrorist campaign of modern times --Barack Obama's global assassination campaign" beam me up scottie Jan 2015 #13
"When the U.S. drones target a person for murder, it kills 27 additional people." RiverLover Jan 2015 #14
While some on Kill List have "died" as many as 7 times Laughing Mirror Jan 2015 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jan 2015 #15
+ Eighty Gazillion Scuba Jan 2015 #18
No kidding. Puglover Jan 2015 #48
Chomsky loyalists? aikoaiko Jan 2015 #49
Starting to see a racial component to Chomsky's diatribes Dreamer Tatum Jan 2015 #16
Yes, he really does seem concerned kiva Jan 2015 #38
But only when killed by Americans leftynyc Jan 2015 #44
All I needed to see was "Noam Chomsky:" hughee99 Jan 2015 #17
lol, I never thought of it that way till now. But..yea. (nt) Inkfreak Jan 2015 #54
K&R.... daleanime Jan 2015 #23
stupidly unfair, since we're going after the terrorists treestar Jan 2015 #25
Stupidly jingoistic. elias49 Jan 2015 #35
"The US defines 'terrorist' any way they want." Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #57
Heck. I'll take 2 generations! elias49 Jan 2015 #59
To those ann--- Jan 2015 #26
There it is. Octafish Jan 2015 #29
When the wealthy and powerful commit terrorism upon the poor and weak, the wealthy and powerful KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #30
++1,000 nt kelliekat44 Jan 2015 #39
Recommend...you can't kill everyone. n/t Jefferson23 Jan 2015 #31
And he would be correct. Fearless Jan 2015 #32
K&R woo me with science Jan 2015 #42
Chomsky vs Micheal Moore marshall Jan 2015 #45
Pretty sure this kind of thing was discussed about......... nolabels Jan 2015 #64
K&R. nt. polly7 Jan 2015 #46
are you accusing my President of being a terrorist? rbrnmw Jan 2015 #47
The hundreds of parents of hundreds of dead children would say so. How about the no coversge Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #52
Never really understood the focus on drones FLPanhandle Jan 2015 #50
This is why Obama will never prosecute the Bush Crime Family. Ferd Berfel Jan 2015 #53
So, you're endorsing President Obama's impeachment and trial as well? brooklynite Jan 2015 #56
No, Ferd Berfel Jan 2015 #61
But you DO think Bush should be prosecuted, right? brooklynite Jan 2015 #62
What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #55
Loyalists: "But we're the good guys, and they're the bad guys!" nt RedCappedBandit Jan 2015 #58
September 12 - A Toy World whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #60
Unrec. Republican rhetoric has no place on Du no matter the source. BlueCaliDem Jan 2015 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Noam Chomsky: Charlie Heb...»Reply #29