General Discussion

AndreaCG

(2,331 posts)

49. So don't smoke either

Thu Jan 22, 2015, 06:18 AM

Jan 2015

If they're prone to giving you cancer.

Although I don't smoke pot I haven't seen the science that says smoking it tends to cause cancer, maybe cause people don't tend to smoke 20-60 a day.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

E-cigarettes can produce more formaldehyde than regular cigarettes, study says [View all] CreekDog Jan 2015 OP

That's a load of junk science bull hockey meow2u3 Jan 2015 #1

What are you saying is the concentration of formaldehyde in human breath? CreekDog Jan 2015 #4

What I'm saying is that this article is propaganda that misleads about the alleged danger of e-cigs meow2u3 Jan 2015 #6

So you really have nothing scientific to offer CreekDog Jan 2015 #12

You want scientific facts? Here they are meow2u3 Jan 2015 #14

there is no science that statement CreekDog Jan 2015 #16

I'd keep an open mind about tobacco harm reduction if I were you meow2u3 Jan 2015 #20

Look at your posts CreekDog Jan 2015 #25

You are right Bozvotros Mar 2015 #52

what about smoking E crack olddots Jan 2015 #2

Mmmmmm. Formaldehyde. KamaAina Jan 2015 #3

Jinro Soju at least used to contain formaldehyde jmowreader Jan 2015 #5

Now you tell me. KamaAina Jan 2015 #45

Two-thirds of your quote is not in the linked article. Ino Jan 2015 #7

Everything I quoted is in the linked article, you have it backwards CreekDog Jan 2015 #10

I expect you don't know this rule... Ino Jan 2015 #47

there is a whole lot of formaldahyde out there olddots Jan 2015 #8

If products like cigarettes and e-cigs are so dangerous bigwillq Jan 2015 #9

does it occur to you that products are banned or regulated after they are found dangerous? CreekDog Jan 2015 #11

Hmm. Last I heard, cigarettes have been found to be dangerous. bigwillq Jan 2015 #13

the article is about e-cigarettes CreekDog Jan 2015 #15

I was talking about e-cigs in my initial post to this thread. bigwillq Jan 2015 #18

they are banned in many cases CreekDog Jan 2015 #19

Ok. Cool. bigwillq Jan 2015 #22

Do you want to see nicotine criminalized? meow2u3 Jan 2015 #17

I think products should be be banned bigwillq Jan 2015 #21

I don't take kindly to being told what I can't put in my body meow2u3 Jan 2015 #23

who is telling you what you can put in your body? CreekDog Jan 2015 #26

There's that issue. bigwillq Jan 2015 #27

What about corn? EvolveOrConvolve Jan 2015 #34

Are you trying to create a straw man because your posts on the science were so bad? CreekDog Jan 2015 #24

The straw man is the alarmist tone of anti-vaping articles meow2u3 Jan 2015 #30

It sounds like a recommendation to use low voltage settings bhikkhu Jan 2015 #28

No, the article directly argues against what you just posted CreekDog Jan 2015 #29

No, I was just reading the article bhikkhu Jan 2015 #32

High voltage should be used only to burn off gunk from coils meow2u3 Jan 2015 #31

The study is suspect for a bunch of reasons EvolveOrConvolve Jan 2015 #33

I live in Detroit, probably more dangerous than smoking e-cigs angstlessk Jan 2015 #40

The Europeans have been studying ecigs much longer Oilwellian Jan 2015 #35

I push the button, blow out the first puff..then lightly inhale the second angstlessk Jan 2015 #39

Our city voted to treat them like cigs, which was great! nt Logical Jan 2015 #36

I'm ferociously allergic to formaldehyde. hunter Jan 2015 #37

I am on e-cigs angstlessk Jan 2015 #38

I went from 36 mg. to 0 mg. in a 7 month span Oilwellian Jan 2015 #41

Based on how I smoked..a little puff and short inhale..I wonder angstlessk Jan 2015 #43

Good for you! Contrary1 Jan 2015 #42

WOW you stayed away for 4 years!!!!! angstlessk Jan 2015 #44

Well, to be honest with you... Contrary1 Jan 2015 #46

I am sorry..what happened to you was NOT an excuse it was a REASON angstlessk Jan 2015 #48

So don't smoke either AndreaCG Jan 2015 #49

the results were yielded by operating the devices improperly. very poor method. Jon82 Mar 2015 #50

seem to be finding your way around very quickly CreekDog Mar 2015 #51

The one study I would like to see but have to wait... Jon82 Mar 2015 #54

Besides, no vaper likes a dry hit meow2u3 Mar 2015 #53