Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
12. the footballs were under inflated
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 03:40 PM
Jan 2015

Nobody has been "caught" doing anything.

Show me some video where a player was messing with the ball and then that player will be caught. It isn't like there are not cameras all over the damn place.


You are making assumptions about how it happened. Nothing I have said is an assumption.

I am not denying anything. I am simply pointing out that the statistical analysis is meaningless (which it is).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Now that's pretty damned interesting. trotsky Jan 2015 #1
In the second half, with inflated balls, the pats clobbered the colts. Warren Stupidity Jan 2015 #2
You're killing me. n/t Whiskeytide Jan 2015 #16
It couldn't have anything to do with Belichick benching fumblers, could it? bluedigger Jan 2015 #3
Right. Because Belichick is the only coach in the NFL LittleBlue Jan 2015 #4
He's pretty well known for being extreme about it. bluedigger Jan 2015 #8
A sampling of one is statistically meaningless Motown_Johnny Jan 2015 #5
Given the track record of the Patriots cheating, it's more of a stretch to NOT believe... MohRokTah Jan 2015 #6
So all the officials in all the games were morons? And only the Pats did it? Motown_Johnny Jan 2015 #10
The Patriots ARE the ONLY outlier in the statistics above. MohRokTah Jan 2015 #11
the footballs were under inflated Motown_Johnny Jan 2015 #12
Caught RED HANDED CHEATING MohRokTah Jan 2015 #13
Yawn. Agschmid Jan 2015 #15
Because it is true. eom MohRokTah Jan 2015 #17
That simply isn't true Motown_Johnny Jan 2015 #21
Teh circumstantial evidence is quite enough. GUILTY! MohRokTah Jan 2015 #22
I sincerely hope that was sarcasm n/t Motown_Johnny Jan 2015 #25
Nope, truth. eom MohRokTah Jan 2015 #26
Guilty before proof, sure seems like a good democratic ideal. Agschmid Jan 2015 #30
Sorry. Circumstantial evidence... Whiskeytide Jan 2015 #32
Having fun? Agschmid Jan 2015 #41
A ball. I'm a Steelers fan... Whiskeytide Jan 2015 #42
Guilty people are guilty from the moment the crime is committed. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2015 #33
How many rushing plays do they run KamaAina Jan 2015 #7
There's no telling from game to game underpants Jan 2015 #18
Of course, one does tend to run it a lot when one is up 45-7 KamaAina Jan 2015 #20
BAd science. GeorgeGist Jan 2015 #9
That is really revealing ... Whiskeytide Jan 2015 #14
:-) underpants Jan 2015 #19
They beat the Colts 45-7 instead of 38-7 underpants Jan 2015 #23
or they've been cheating since roughly the year 2000 Johonny Jan 2015 #34
any analysis of deflated balls Enrique Jan 2015 #24
The Colts had no sack in that game underpants Jan 2015 #35
I still have the question hfojvt Jan 2015 #27
Eagles fan here Hari Seldon Jan 2015 #28
My question is this: A-Long-Little-Doggie Jan 2015 #29
First half scores DO effect the second half play calls. rickford66 Jan 2015 #31
Question for anyone who's been following this Jim Lane Jan 2015 #36
36 balls are wieghed, measured, and have their pressure tested a few hours before the game ..... Botany Jan 2015 #38
Here is the basic procedure mythology Jan 2015 #39
Strange procedure IMO Jim Lane Jan 2015 #40
You fumble once on that team and you're benched. tranche Jan 2015 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Statistical analysis show...»Reply #12