Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

underpants

(196,529 posts)

35. The Colts had no sack in that game

Reply to Enrique (Reply #24)

Fri Jan 23, 2015, 04:57 PM

Jan 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Statistical analysis shows how Patriots benefited from deflated ball [View all] LittleBlue Jan 2015 OP

Now that's pretty damned interesting. trotsky Jan 2015 #1

In the second half, with inflated balls, the pats clobbered the colts. Warren Stupidity Jan 2015 #2

You're killing me. n/t Whiskeytide Jan 2015 #16

It couldn't have anything to do with Belichick benching fumblers, could it? bluedigger Jan 2015 #3

Right. Because Belichick is the only coach in the NFL LittleBlue Jan 2015 #4

He's pretty well known for being extreme about it. bluedigger Jan 2015 #8

A sampling of one is statistically meaningless Motown_Johnny Jan 2015 #5

Given the track record of the Patriots cheating, it's more of a stretch to NOT believe... MohRokTah Jan 2015 #6

So all the officials in all the games were morons? And only the Pats did it? Motown_Johnny Jan 2015 #10

The Patriots ARE the ONLY outlier in the statistics above. MohRokTah Jan 2015 #11

the footballs were under inflated Motown_Johnny Jan 2015 #12

Caught RED HANDED CHEATING MohRokTah Jan 2015 #13

Yawn. Agschmid Jan 2015 #15

Because it is true. eom MohRokTah Jan 2015 #17

That simply isn't true Motown_Johnny Jan 2015 #21

Teh circumstantial evidence is quite enough. GUILTY! MohRokTah Jan 2015 #22

I sincerely hope that was sarcasm n/t Motown_Johnny Jan 2015 #25

Nope, truth. eom MohRokTah Jan 2015 #26

Guilty before proof, sure seems like a good democratic ideal. Agschmid Jan 2015 #30

Sorry. Circumstantial evidence... Whiskeytide Jan 2015 #32

Having fun? Agschmid Jan 2015 #41

A ball. I'm a Steelers fan... Whiskeytide Jan 2015 #42

Guilty people are guilty from the moment the crime is committed. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2015 #33

How many rushing plays do they run KamaAina Jan 2015 #7

There's no telling from game to game underpants Jan 2015 #18

Of course, one does tend to run it a lot when one is up 45-7 KamaAina Jan 2015 #20

BAd science. GeorgeGist Jan 2015 #9

That is really revealing ... Whiskeytide Jan 2015 #14

:-) underpants Jan 2015 #19

They beat the Colts 45-7 instead of 38-7 underpants Jan 2015 #23

or they've been cheating since roughly the year 2000 Johonny Jan 2015 #34

any analysis of deflated balls Enrique Jan 2015 #24

The Colts had no sack in that game underpants Jan 2015 #35

I still have the question hfojvt Jan 2015 #27

Eagles fan here Hari Seldon Jan 2015 #28

My question is this: A-Long-Little-Doggie Jan 2015 #29

First half scores DO effect the second half play calls. rickford66 Jan 2015 #31

Question for anyone who's been following this Jim Lane Jan 2015 #36

36 balls are wieghed, measured, and have their pressure tested a few hours before the game ..... Botany Jan 2015 #38

Here is the basic procedure mythology Jan 2015 #39

Strange procedure IMO Jim Lane Jan 2015 #40

You fumble once on that team and you're benched. tranche Jan 2015 #37