Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How much social justice would $3,000,000,000,000 buy? [View all]Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)80. Excellent post.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A hell of a lot. Now I'm not going to hold her vote against her, most democrats did vote for it.
Autumn
Feb 2015
#1
I stand corrected my dearest Manny, I only included the senate since our VP was happy to vote for it
Autumn
Feb 2015
#7
I understand why you hold it against her and I support you on that. She still supports the wars
Autumn
Feb 2015
#12
We knew, they in their positions had to have known more and yet they voted for it
Autumn
Feb 2015
#48
Others voting against it doesn't excuse her. If any other who voted for that invasion run for
merrily
Feb 2015
#52
I can't be a hypocrite. I voted for Kerry when he ran and he voted for it so to me I owed her a pass
Autumn
Feb 2015
#61
Just like her husband, who condemned a mentally ill man to death just to get elected.
NYC_SKP
Feb 2015
#2
I totally agree with you but do wonder still why she might have thought it was
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#44
Center right think tanks did think it was a good idea, but I don't think that excuses her.
merrily
Feb 2015
#53
There is no excusing the bastards that pushed us into that war. But it doesn't make sense for
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#83
Not only voted. Advocated for it. Tried to persuade her fellow Senators to vote for it.
merrily
Feb 2015
#86
And it is not the rich who profited from the war in the ME that are being asked to pay for it.
jwirr
Feb 2015
#4
To the contrary, the US requires that the nations let military contractors off the hook, even if
merrily
Feb 2015
#54
He's right. Either she voted for the IWR out of political expediency or she's stupid.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2015
#5
I believe it was Karl Rove who claimed that Democrats forced W. to invade Iraq.
McCamy Taylor
Feb 2015
#13
One of the favorite tricks of Republicans is to accuse someone else of what they are doing..
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#14
You are one of the few that try to rationalize HRC's vote to murder innocent Iraqis.
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#46
She said herself that she'd heard from constituents both ways. And she never said that more
merrily
Feb 2015
#56
She advocated for it and she voted for it. She owns that, not the entire war. But that more than
merrily
Feb 2015
#57
DU knew the Bush Admin was manipulating intelligence (US and British)...
WorseBeforeBetter
Feb 2015
#62
Isn't that supposed to be Hillary's attraction, she's more than the "usual politician" ?
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#28
You can vote for her if you want, but I think she is just the usual politician.
rgbecker
Feb 2015
#32
There seems to be an inordinate number of Viet Nam Vets with unclear memories.
Enthusiast
Feb 2015
#78
There is absolutely NO democracy, and NO candidate is worthy of any following, UNTIL they come out
mother earth
Feb 2015
#23
Yet, Ike sent troops to Lebanon when we had no business being there. Didn't he also say "guns and
merrily
Feb 2015
#66
always interesting to me how supposedly liberal dem state senators split their votes, effectively
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#34
some of the state pairs appear to trade off on the controversial votes. just something i've
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#38
Hard Choices - fuck the country now with political expediency so you can survive to fuck the country
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#30
"the eventual cost of the Iraq war will be over three trillion dollars." I seem to recall that at
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#31
When asked about cost on one of the talking head shows, Cheney said we might even make money, given
merrily
Feb 2015
#59
Oh, way better than merely cheap. Iraq oil would pay for it and maybe more than pay for it.
merrily
Feb 2015
#60
K&R What utter garbage we are fed by the corporate propaganda machine.
woo me with science
Feb 2015
#36
This is America, the land of Mad Men, everything is a product to be bought and sold
Fumesucker
Feb 2015
#73
So much freedom you can feel an amazing jolt of electrical energy when you exercise them.
raouldukelives
Feb 2015
#87