Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Rahm Emanuel’s “Huge Embarrassment”: What It Means For Liberals — And America - Salon [View all]
Rahm Emanuels huge embarrassment: What it means for liberals and AmericaThe mayor of Chicago is finding out the hard way that the Democratic base is fed up with neoliberalism
Elias Isquith - Salon
Wednesday, Feb 25, 2015 11:04 AM PST

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel (Credit: AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)
The liberal wing of the Democratic Party can be susceptible to the moral victory fallacy, which in its most degraded form considers a righteous loser preferable to a compromised winner. All the same, its hard not to interpret Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuels Pyrrhic victory on Tuesday as a major win for the partys economically populist wing. After all, this is Chicago were talking about; incumbent mayors expect to be crowned, not subjected to the indignity of actually campaigning for reelection.
Before I take another guess at the results implications, though, heres a quick recap of Chicagos unusually competitive mayoral campaign. If you look at the final results, youll see that Emanuel was far and away the most popular single candidate, logging 45 percent of the vote. Thats more than 10 percentage points higher than Jesus Chuy Garcia, the relatively unknown Cook County commissioner who came in second. But a key thing to understand about this campaign is that Emanuels securing a plurality was never in doubt. He never trailed in the polls, in fact.
The real question, instead, was whether hed be able to win more than 50 percent of the vote, and thus avoid an April runoff election. Historically, this is something Chicagos mayor has almost always accomplished with relative ease; its even more perfunctory than when an incumbent president runs in his partys primary before the general election. Yet despite his national profile, the backing of the citys formidable Democratic machine, an ungodly sum of money, and the support of his former boss (and fellow Chicagoan) President Obama, Emanuel fell short. Experts on Chicago politics described his failure as a huge embarrassment.
Before I take another guess at the results implications, though, heres a quick recap of Chicagos unusually competitive mayoral campaign. If you look at the final results, youll see that Emanuel was far and away the most popular single candidate, logging 45 percent of the vote. Thats more than 10 percentage points higher than Jesus Chuy Garcia, the relatively unknown Cook County commissioner who came in second. But a key thing to understand about this campaign is that Emanuels securing a plurality was never in doubt. He never trailed in the polls, in fact.
The real question, instead, was whether hed be able to win more than 50 percent of the vote, and thus avoid an April runoff election. Historically, this is something Chicagos mayor has almost always accomplished with relative ease; its even more perfunctory than when an incumbent president runs in his partys primary before the general election. Yet despite his national profile, the backing of the citys formidable Democratic machine, an ungodly sum of money, and the support of his former boss (and fellow Chicagoan) President Obama, Emanuel fell short. Experts on Chicago politics described his failure as a huge embarrassment.
And...
Of course, as encouraging as Emanuels stumble is to the left wing of the Democratic Party, itd be the height of folly to declare victory over the third way, neoliberal approach just yet. Emanuel is quite likely to defeat Garcia now that the two are going one-on-one. And protest votes can have a way of making people think the battles been won, when in truth its only just started. Nevertheless, if we pair Emanuels hollow victory with other recent, successful campaigns from the left like Sen. Elizabeth Warrens thwarting of the Antonio Weiss nomination, or Zephyr Teachouts humbling of Gov. Andrew Cuomo its hard to deny that theres a change happening within the Democratic base.
And for their own sake if nothing else, Hillary Clinton and the other national leaders in the Democratic Party would be wise to pay it attention.
And for their own sake if nothing else, Hillary Clinton and the other national leaders in the Democratic Party would be wise to pay it attention.
Link: http://www.salon.com/2015/02/25/rahm_emanuels_huge_embarrassment_what_it_means_for_liberals_and_america/
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rahm Emanuel’s “Huge Embarrassment”: What It Means For Liberals — And America - Salon [View all]
WillyT
Feb 2015
OP
why? he likes privatization and giving public money & property to corporations, just like the
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#57
just because someone has a D by their name doesn't make them a democrat. Unless you
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#58
so you consider lieberman and miller democrats? i guess you and your buds... well....
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#88
Wow, party before Country. I bet you condemn the Republicans when they do that.
A Simple Game
Feb 2015
#99
Everyone who can needs to help Garcia. There IS a chance if people come out to vote, that
sabrina 1
Feb 2015
#7
They mention that a change is coming to the Democratic Party. It can't get here
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#17
There is a change coming, not just here, see the Mid Terms eg, when the Progressives won and
sabrina 1
Feb 2015
#43
That's good, man. Good for you. There was a "farfegnugen" sticker that used to say "fukinmissim"
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2015
#148
No one gets pushed to the left. They may change their rhetoric to try to appease the Left
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#21
Do you think someone "pushed" LBJ to the left? That would be rather remarkable. nm
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#42
I think there is a difference between Obama and Rahm. Pres Obama could speak like a progressive.
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#121
You can't push someone to the Left. They are what they are. All that phrase means is 'push them to
sabrina 1
Feb 2015
#46
And it's way-crazy to think that anyone could push H. Clinton to the left. In 2008
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#54
omg, she couldn't find her way to the left with the help of google maps and Waze!
cui bono
Feb 2015
#95
On Warren 'pushing others to the left' it really should be noted that many Democrats are to her
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2015
#62
Sorry... I Just Get So Fed Up With The "Warren Was A Republican..." Nonsense...
WillyT
Feb 2015
#117
Even Obama's support and a $10 mill. advantage couldn't carry Rahm over the finish line.
Divernan
Feb 2015
#19
I do not want Rahm Emanuel in the Democratic Party. I don't care of he changes to GOP.
Enthusiast
Feb 2015
#28
Was Rahm part of the early Chicago Penny Pritzker, Hilton-Superior Bank support for BO?
appalachiablue
Feb 2015
#85
Emanuel has sorely underestimated Chicagoans rage over the parking meters
riderinthestorm
Feb 2015
#32
I thought the parking meter fiasco was Daley's final gift on his way out the door . . .
hatrack
Feb 2015
#72
It was but Emanuel has taken that privatization scheme and expanded it 10x
riderinthestorm
Feb 2015
#109
Nader and Nader voters are being used as scapegoats for the failure of the Democratic
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#56
Well that was a lame ass comparison. Who's bush in this scenario? nt
Guy Whitey Corngood
Feb 2015
#60
Why is "huge embarrassment" about a Dem so bruited on a Dem website?!1 I don't care. n/t
UTUSN
Feb 2015
#73
You can have him. Maybe he'll shut down schools and city run mental health clinics
Guy Whitey Corngood
Feb 2015
#102
Rahm and Debbie Wasserman Shultz - the very model of the loony right wing of the Dem Party
whereisjustice
Feb 2015
#81
http://media.liveauctiongroup.net/i/9378/10425744_2.jpg?v=8CDBD2ABE243CF0
blkmusclmachine
Feb 2015
#86
"it’s hard to deny that there’s a change happening within the Democratic base"
cui bono
Feb 2015
#90
Insulting people is not generally a good strategy to get them to vote the way you want
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2015
#96
Politics aside, I've always considered the guy a jerk. Kind of a skinny Chris Christie.
Vinca
Feb 2015
#100
I'm donating money to García and will volunteer to get the vote out. I still think
Guy Whitey Corngood
Feb 2015
#105
when he loses the runoff, I want to know where to line up to piss on his political grave
yurbud
Feb 2015
#113
It's still an uphill climb for García. We'll do our best but can't guarantee you'll have
Guy Whitey Corngood
Feb 2015
#129
In that case we'll need the big bottle for him and his boy Rauner. nt
Guy Whitey Corngood
Feb 2015
#134
Another major factor (not mentioned in the article) is Rahm's support of our new
Snarkoleptic
Feb 2015
#116