Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 
15. ballooning empire
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:49 PM
May 2012

I agree with that. If we borrowed money from the people and then gave it back to them intelligently in the form of better schools, infrastructure, power grids, etc., then it could result in a net positive gain over time. As you said, if you're going to deflate the dollar to spend money, then it should have an economic value that returns more than it takes. While our military force does provide jobs to those in the military and those industries that support the military, I don't see money spent on the military as a net positive. The question is whether or not the government has the wisdom to spend our money in ways that make our country a better place to live and right now they don't. I feel like they waste our money. I would prefer to keep my money and spend it locally to create a better place right here where I live than to give it to the government to muck up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Krugman debates Ron Paul [View all] ProSense May 2012 OP
I think everybody is wrong. napoleon_in_rags May 2012 #1
That wasn't a debate... MrScorpio May 2012 #2
that's all he knows how to do... Blue_Tires May 2012 #29
Diocletian ended the crisis of the third century and let the Empire survive another century Recursion May 2012 #3
pwned joshcryer May 2012 #4
I might have Diocletian coinage. mmonk May 2012 #5
He just explained 80% of whatever Georege Will says too. JoePhilly May 2012 #6
debate politicaljunkie12 May 2012 #7
Do you support Ron Paul for president? cyberswede May 2012 #8
Ron Paul politicaljunkie12 May 2012 #10
I notice you don't say you're not anti-Obama Morning Dew May 2012 #11
or anti-obama politicaljunkie12 May 2012 #13
I guess you are stuck. Morning Dew May 2012 #14
Having An Unlimited Money Supply Is How We Pay for the Global Military Empire Yavin4 May 2012 #9
ballooning empire politicaljunkie12 May 2012 #15
Who spend locally? Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #16
Crickets. Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #24
... Son of Gob May 2012 #26
The Gold Standard was abandoned because it was a dismal failure and exacerbated the Depression Taitertots May 2012 #20
No Sane Person Will Argue for a Strict Return to the Gold Standard. However... Yavin4 May 2012 #23
But there are insane people who do, i.e. Ron Paul Taitertots May 2012 #25
Ofc the gold standard failed solely Dokkie May 2012 #28
I don't know how Krugman kept a straight face through TBF May 2012 #12
Read that too quick rufus dog May 2012 #17
Gotta feel sorry for Krugman gratuitous May 2012 #18
They're both in outer space. girl gone mad May 2012 #19
haha politicaljunkie12 May 2012 #21
I've heard Krugman say that austerity budgets (while they may reduce deficits) are bad pampango May 2012 #22
trash can HappyMe May 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Krugman debates Ron Paul»Reply #15