Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
28. I'm gonna ask one more time so we can discuss
Thu Mar 12, 2015, 10:51 AM
Mar 2015

Is this a traitorous act? I actually don't think so. The Constitution has been clarified, that one can ony act as a traitor during times of war and the USA is not currently at war with Iran.

"The Treason Clause applies only to disloyal acts committed during times of war. Acts of dis-loyalty during peacetime are not considered treasonous under the Constitution" http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/treason

Again, I welcome discussion...if you can try and hold back the insults, perhaps you may even learn a little something.

Clearly the 47 Senators suck big time. They are nasty, made the USA look bad in international eyes, they are dis-loyal and undermined the whole peace process. Which is not too surpriseing since they are the party of war. Hollerin' about treason, when it may not actually fit the circumstances, just makes Dems look foolish.

So, I read that there is a high level of disloyalty. What is the protocal for such acts?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Aiders and abettors KamaAina Mar 2015 #1
DERP nt tridim Mar 2015 #2
Worthless n/t fredamae Mar 2015 #3
Discretionary. nt dumbcat Mar 2015 #4
How can you even dare ask such a question? Octafish Mar 2015 #5
look up legal defn't of traitor...lets just start there with the discussion. n/t Sheepshank Mar 2015 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Mar 2015 #7
You should do as he says. Look up the definition of sedition also. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #9
here...I'll write it slowly Sheepshank Mar 2015 #25
actually it's your own "education" that is in question. Sheepshank Mar 2015 #24
Yes..your tone certainly suggests you "invite discussion"!? Opening with "Grow the fuck up" is so inviting.... Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #26
I'm still waiting for Bush & Cheney to be brought up on charges. lpbk2713 Mar 2015 #8
This Nation will have no moral standing until this occurs. n/t PowerToThePeople Mar 2015 #18
No viable case can be made to charge them with Treason TexasProgresive Mar 2015 #10
What would I call them? People who actually know the definition & limitations of the term "traitor." Hekate Mar 2015 #11
Nice try at trying to turn the tables frazzled Mar 2015 #12
More traitors FiveGoodMen Mar 2015 #13
You're either with us or against us! Telcontar Mar 2015 #15
Happens to be true FiveGoodMen Mar 2015 #19
Apparently you and George II have much in common Telcontar Mar 2015 #22
I eagerly await the coming national purge pinboy3niner Mar 2015 #16
The instruments of death will be used on us if we don't stop this. FiveGoodMen Mar 2015 #20
Hyperbole much? pinboy3niner Mar 2015 #21
Derelict PADemD Mar 2015 #14
Complicit n/t 99Forever Mar 2015 #17
One of the ancient Greek philosophers, I forget which one, once asked... Binkie The Clown Mar 2015 #23
I call them smart enough to understand the word treason mythology Mar 2015 #27
I'm gonna ask one more time so we can discuss Sheepshank Mar 2015 #28
In this case, I'd call them very smart. MineralMan Mar 2015 #29
I call your post absurd. and the comparison to torture, ridiculous. cali Mar 2015 #30
Another thread complaining not about the 47 Republicans... SidDithers Mar 2015 #31
the stupid it burns. n/t cali Mar 2015 #32
Elevating idiocy to treason doesn't make it actionable./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #33
I would call them stage left Mar 2015 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #28