Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Last August, HRC used exactly the same words as Bibi to justify his No Two-State stand. [View all]leveymg
(36,418 posts)4. Regardless. Nobody seems particularly surprised that HRC is running with Bibi against Obama
on these essential Mideast war and peace issues. Is that okay with you?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Last August, HRC used exactly the same words as Bibi to justify his No Two-State stand. [View all]
leveymg
Mar 2015
OP
Regardless. Nobody seems particularly surprised that HRC is running with Bibi against Obama
leveymg
Mar 2015
#4
Now how did you vome to this conclusion from these statements. Maybe it is
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#6
Would you ever believe as SOS and Bibi would have gotten into a discussion before or just
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#9
What I believe isn't really important. What's clear is that she supports Bibi and is against Obama
leveymg
Mar 2015
#11
You don't have anything to support your thoughts and if it was in the pastshe did not attend the
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#19
I disagree with your spin on this. The plain-language of both statements is virtually identical.
leveymg
Mar 2015
#26
Good, you dont accept my spin, gotcha ya, doesnt make me wrong and I dont accept your spin.
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#28
supporting Israel no matter what is NOT in the best interests of either Israel or the U.S.
cali
Mar 2015
#5
Hillary was in DC on the Netanyahu speech day and was encouraged to attend
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#8
That would have put her in a position where she might be expected to comment. So she didn't attend.
leveymg
Mar 2015
#12
She still had the right to comment. Just pointing out she did not, perhaps in step with Obama.
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#16
Her comment, in fact, was issued to Goldberg a month after Bibi's pronouncement.
leveymg
Mar 2015
#29
Thnak you for that. It provides context about collapse of talks over continued settlement
leveymg
Mar 2015
#36
Yes about a two state solution which has been Obama's agenda since he has been president,
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#37
Eh, that is the two-state position. This is from 2014, it was a couple of weeks ago when comments
Chathamization
Mar 2015
#18
"non-militarized state" from the article. The Palestinian "state" not being allowed to have a
Chathamization
Mar 2015
#21
But like I said, that wasn't even considred opposition to two-states; last year, Netanyahu was
Chathamization
Mar 2015
#24
Thanks. The transcript shows Clinton in favor of a two-state solution, take a position that seems to
Chathamization
Mar 2015
#33
No. That excerpt (which includes the quote from your OP) is from the 2014 interview. Hillary is
Chathamization
Mar 2015
#38
Sadly, in the end, you may be right. Israel may never permit a Palestinian state
leveymg
Mar 2015
#27