Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Last August, HRC used exactly the same words as Bibi to justify his No Two-State stand. [View all]Chathamization
(1,638 posts)21. "non-militarized state" from the article. The Palestinian "state" not being allowed to have a
military has been an ongoing Israeli demand (amongst others). A fully sovereign state has never been on the table.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Last August, HRC used exactly the same words as Bibi to justify his No Two-State stand. [View all]
leveymg
Mar 2015
OP
Regardless. Nobody seems particularly surprised that HRC is running with Bibi against Obama
leveymg
Mar 2015
#4
Now how did you vome to this conclusion from these statements. Maybe it is
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#6
Would you ever believe as SOS and Bibi would have gotten into a discussion before or just
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#9
What I believe isn't really important. What's clear is that she supports Bibi and is against Obama
leveymg
Mar 2015
#11
You don't have anything to support your thoughts and if it was in the pastshe did not attend the
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#19
I disagree with your spin on this. The plain-language of both statements is virtually identical.
leveymg
Mar 2015
#26
Good, you dont accept my spin, gotcha ya, doesnt make me wrong and I dont accept your spin.
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#28
supporting Israel no matter what is NOT in the best interests of either Israel or the U.S.
cali
Mar 2015
#5
Hillary was in DC on the Netanyahu speech day and was encouraged to attend
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#8
That would have put her in a position where she might be expected to comment. So she didn't attend.
leveymg
Mar 2015
#12
She still had the right to comment. Just pointing out she did not, perhaps in step with Obama.
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#16
Her comment, in fact, was issued to Goldberg a month after Bibi's pronouncement.
leveymg
Mar 2015
#29
Thnak you for that. It provides context about collapse of talks over continued settlement
leveymg
Mar 2015
#36
Yes about a two state solution which has been Obama's agenda since he has been president,
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#37
Eh, that is the two-state position. This is from 2014, it was a couple of weeks ago when comments
Chathamization
Mar 2015
#18
"non-militarized state" from the article. The Palestinian "state" not being allowed to have a
Chathamization
Mar 2015
#21
But like I said, that wasn't even considred opposition to two-states; last year, Netanyahu was
Chathamization
Mar 2015
#24
Thanks. The transcript shows Clinton in favor of a two-state solution, take a position that seems to
Chathamization
Mar 2015
#33
No. That excerpt (which includes the quote from your OP) is from the 2014 interview. Hillary is
Chathamization
Mar 2015
#38
Sadly, in the end, you may be right. Israel may never permit a Palestinian state
leveymg
Mar 2015
#27