Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WallStreet’s POLITICAL SHAKEDOWN:We’ll Stop Funding Dems if Elizabeth Warren won’t SIT DOWN & SHUTUP [View all]stonecutter357
(13,018 posts)39. never
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WallStreet’s POLITICAL SHAKEDOWN:We’ll Stop Funding Dems if Elizabeth Warren won’t SIT DOWN & SHUTUP [View all]
Segami
Mar 2015
OP
Oh silly ...she will fight for the new middle class ...which is bankers and Wall Street brokers.
L0oniX
Mar 2015
#14
That should be my pat response to all pro Hillary posts: Sorry ...I'm not in that club.
L0oniX
Mar 2015
#21
At least it will give the pro Hillary Goldman oligarchy alert crew something to do.
L0oniX
Mar 2015
#24
How about you Hill Lovers give us a reason to vote for her? She can beat other pugs is not one.
Vincardog
Mar 2015
#44
Perhaps I was unclear "She can beat OTHER pugs is not one" because she is a pug. She is clearly
Vincardog
Mar 2015
#90
The lesser of the two evils is STILL EVIL. You can't give 1 reason to vote for her. It says a lot
Vincardog
Mar 2015
#94
"a comment in context would render your comment out of place" - I would happily make a retraction..
Veilex
Mar 2015
#92
Of course "winning" is more important. Yeah we win. More important that reestablishing our
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#73
I recognize that some prefer to boil slowly. I don't agree. I see that we are being
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#77
So rather than the "slow boil", you prefer the "quick burn"? {sigh} ...
1StrongBlackMan
Mar 2015
#78
I would rather take the risk of the "quick burn" or liberty than bow down to the system
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#80
" Gawd you guys are not only shrill and hysterical, you never offer a viable alternative"
DonCoquixote
Mar 2015
#54
So if that's true why don't you give us a substantive reason to support H. Clinton.
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#72
If anything she will get a flood of money from them to make sure Warren doesn't have a chance.
L0oniX
Mar 2015
#16
OK, does that mean that small contributors like us need to step up and contribute more money?
NBachers
Mar 2015
#2
If he monied elite don't stop corrupting our elections we should publicly fund them, and OUTLAW
Vincardog
Mar 2015
#5
LMFAO ...spewing over my keyboard. Damn it ...you owe me a new red back light keyboard.
L0oniX
Mar 2015
#11
Hard to decide who is more of an enemy of the common people, Shitigroup, SkankofAmerica, HellsCargo
L0oniX
Mar 2015
#10
After their bailout by us taxpayers we should have thrown the crooks in jail! How dare them to speak
B Calm
Mar 2015
#13
WallStreet’s POLITICAL SHAKEDOWN:We’ll Stop Funding Dems if Elizabeth Warren won’t SIT DOWN & SHUTUP
The CCC
Mar 2015
#29
the quest for $ because "we need to win this" has left the party completely open: patrons
MisterP
Mar 2015
#34
Wall Street tries to depict her as angry or anti-business for promoting sound policy.
pa28
Mar 2015
#35
Good. Maybe then the Democrats that have been getting money from the banks will start
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2015
#36
Churches, insurance & oil Companies and financial institutions banned from political activism
Sheepshank
Mar 2015
#38
Thanks Wall Street You really made voting even easier Hey Dems take Wall Street Money and You dont
anotojefiremnesuka
Mar 2015
#68
FUCK YOU, WALLSTREET!! you gawdamned suit and tie wearing muthafuckas!! just fuck right off.
Tuesday Afternoon
Mar 2015
#69
One question why is Reuters the only so called media, the source for this so-called meeting...
Historic NY
Mar 2015
#79