Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

99Forever

(14,524 posts)

9. What a huge surprise.

Reply to WillyT (Original post)

Sat Mar 28, 2015, 07:56 AM

Mar 2015

Not.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Banksters Did However Say... That They Had No Problem With Hillary Clinton And Were Planning... [View all] WillyT Mar 2015 OP

So you're linking to your earlier thread cuz you didn't get enough replies? zappaman Mar 2015 #1

Sometimes I post for just a few people fadedrose Mar 2015 #26

No... I Was Focusing On A Point... That Needs Pointing Out... WillyT Mar 2015 #33

Oh. zappaman Mar 2015 #34

Yep... I Didn't Want Anyone Here To Get The Wrong Idea That HRC Is Some Sort Of Progressive... WillyT Mar 2015 #35

Nothing new here same old same old, doesnt change facts Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #2

Well you are right Joe Turner Mar 2015 #3

Yes I am comfortable with Hillary and the truth, Hillary doesn't work for Wall Street, this is Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #4

The facts could not be any straighter Joe Turner Mar 2015 #7

Name a President who didn't receive Wall St. donations. JaneyVee Mar 2015 #10

Financed, which potential candidate isnt financed by wall street. Looks like getting Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #15

"Looks like getting Financed by wall street makes candidates qualified.". Qualified indeed. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2015 #27

Pro war, pro Wall Street, pro TPP, pro Keystone XL, pro H-1B visas, member of "The Family". Scuba Mar 2015 #11

^^^Spot on, Scuba RiverLover Mar 2015 #12

Not spot on, quite the opposite actually. JaneyVee Mar 2015 #22

So Unions were upset about, and met with Hill, over something that's a phony RW smear? How odd! RiverLover Mar 2015 #28

Could you possibly list Warren's qualifications? Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #29

Yeah ok. I'm not the one with blinders on. JaneyVee Mar 2015 #30

Cognitive dissonance, yes you have written this over and over, you have convinced yourself. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #13

These are not right-wing talking point, these are honest assessments. The right wing never ... Scuba Mar 2015 #14

Yea, meeting with lobbyists from oil, tobacco and energy, yep right in the posket of lobbyists. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #16

Yes, Bernie was at a Democratic Party event where some lobbyists were also present. Not quite ... Scuba Mar 2015 #18

Bernie is not in demand for getting the big bucks for giving speeches, not qualified for the job. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #19

Now we're mad at her getting paid speaking gigs? JaneyVee Mar 2015 #21

Her actions do not support her words. Scuba Mar 2015 #24

How so? She voted for campaign reform and... JaneyVee Mar 2015 #25

Really? SE Cupp spent all show calling her... JaneyVee Mar 2015 #17

So SE Cupp has the same stupid belittling name for Clinton that some DUers do? zappaman Mar 2015 #32

I think everyone knows she's got their backs. Not surprising that they continue bribing her. GoneFishin Mar 2015 #5

K&R liberal_at_heart Mar 2015 #6

K&R woo me with science Mar 2015 #8

What a huge surprise. 99Forever Mar 2015 #9

Of course, it makes perfect sense. DeSwiss Mar 2015 #20

And in 2008, Wall Street barely gave to McLame... joeybee12 Mar 2015 #23

Worth reading - "NAFTA, TPP & The Clinton Global Initiative's "Free Trade" Activism" (Jan 2015) RiverLover Mar 2015 #31

Huge K & R !!! - Thank You !!! -I'll DU It... WillyT Mar 2015 #36