Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
38. I don't have access to all the information
Fri May 4, 2012, 06:16 PM
May 2012

Last edited Fri May 4, 2012, 06:54 PM - Edit history (3)

Understand that we all are continuously bombarded by radiation. A large portion passes completely through us without any ill affect. We are comprised of mostly empty space. A difficult concept to wrap your head around.

There are many forms of radiation. The harmful versions are known as ionizing radiation. The process of stripping electrons from molecules.

With respect to radiological control, there are various aspects to consider depending on the event. Most concerns are easily addressed by distance from the source.

For example, fission will yield excess nuetrons that will be absorbed by other molecules in close proximity. These absorbed nuetrons will cause their new hosts to become radioactive. This is known as activation. Hence, the steel and concrete in the Fukishima storage basin is likely activated.

Another type of radiation is known as beta/gamma radiation (one is a particle, the other in the light spectrum) and is present because the fuel rods (primarily) are undergoing radioactive decay. This type of radiation travels a longer distance than nuetrons (smaller, less chance of collisions, no chance of absorption) and can penetrate dense objects. Still, with respect to Fukishima, an issue that is addressed by proximity. A person at 300 feet distance from the source should be relatively safe. Think of this exposure as similar to being shined upon by a spotlight. Not something you take internally, or other wise known as external dose.


The area of concern is contamination in the form of airborne particulate and the hazard is from some type of ingestion. Open wounds, smoking, inhalation, drinking, and eating are all forms of body entry. Some particulate will leave the body naturally. Mucus, urine, excretion, bleeding, etc.

Some isotopes are particularly difficult to excrete. Plutonium is in that category.

In summary, the affected individuals will primarily be the inhabitants of Japan. The closer to the source, the more likely the exposure.

I personally feel very safe here in North America and consider my biggest health risk (from Fukishima) would come from eating foods imported from Japan. I dislike sushi anyway.

Nuclear energy is the beginning of the end of civilization as we presently know it madokie May 2012 #1
What, you were against electricity too cheap to meter? Fumesucker May 2012 #2
We have it using hydroelectric in the PNWest Generic Other May 2012 #3
The Trojan reactor taught us Viva_La_Revolution May 2012 #4
Hydro is great where it's feasible.. Fumesucker May 2012 #13
Lots of hydro here in northeast Oklahoma madokie May 2012 #23
We have hydro, just not nearly enough for the development here.. Fumesucker May 2012 #24
We seem to be having a very mild spring/summer so far this year madokie May 2012 #29
mmm. I'm still waiting for them to take away my meter... nilram May 2012 #25
Thanks! This is more of the evidence I need while working on my political theory snooper2 May 2012 #5
I don't think you're getting the point flamingdem May 2012 #7
Gotcha... Anyway, this is just one more for the file.. snooper2 May 2012 #10
Lay it out Snoop flamingdem May 2012 #11
You don't publish a paper before you have all the evidence you need snooper2 May 2012 #12
Not a good idea flamingdem May 2012 #14
Also note that this thread is struggling to get recs flamingdem May 2012 #8
Note: my K & R L0oniX May 2012 #15
I think it is profoundly counterproductive for experts like Gundersen to make such remarks. snagglepuss May 2012 #33
A statement, true or false, sulphurdunn May 2012 #28
Asahi TV: “Unbelievable” If Unit 4 pool gets a crack from quake and leaks, it would be end for Tokyo flamingdem May 2012 #6
Can you believe we're still discussing this horrible issue... CoffeeCat May 2012 #30
Hi CC! flamingdem May 2012 #32
... SammyWinstonJack May 2012 #9
K & R L0oniX May 2012 #16
K & R MoreGOPoop May 2012 #17
I posted a story a few days ago about Saudis buying up African farmland.. Fumesucker May 2012 #18
K&R suffragette May 2012 #19
K&R. n/t DLevine May 2012 #20
On The Beach slackmaster May 2012 #21
Well I would expect so. There wasn't any cesium in any of those bombs 4th law of robotics May 2012 #22
it says "from all" paulk May 2012 #26
OK, so the title is factually incorrect. DCKit May 2012 #27
New link/missed it: Livestream of Press Conference on Fukushima Daiichi Disaster Today at 10 am EDT. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #31
I hope we can watch that later. nt bananas May 2012 #34
It's so hard to know what and who to believe these days Marrah_G May 2012 #35
You CAN eliminate all of these: bvar22 May 2012 #37
I don't have access to all the information mick063 May 2012 #38
I'll enjoy having California all to myself. hunter May 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gundersen: Move south of ...»Reply #38