General Discussion

marym625

(17,997 posts)

56. I'm sure it does

Mon Apr 13, 2015, 07:49 AM

Apr 2015

But it also means moving forward by moving right

Don't get me wrong. As I said, I don't care what a logo looks like. It isn't going to influence my vote one way or another for anyone. I responded to a post, that is not a serious issue, from someone I respect. I just don't believe that this logo wasn't discussed and tested up the wazoo. It's being interpreted the way it is because that is what it is meant to say. It's what Hillary Clinton has said for a long time, reaching across the isle, compromise, etc.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] KMOD Apr 2015 OP

I made it blue! Agschmid Apr 2015 #1

Your logo is not coming through for me. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #5

. Agschmid Apr 2015 #7

I get the original logo... Action_Patrol Apr 2015 #12

Yep, red, white, and blue. joshcryer Apr 2015 #20

Haha I try! Agschmid Apr 2015 #21

You did well. Funny how simple color swaps change everything. Action_Patrol Apr 2015 #22

Much better. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #14

Here's the color they use for their social media button: joshcryer Apr 2015 #18

Cool thanks. Agschmid Apr 2015 #19

She could do one with the arrow in pink BainsBane Apr 2015 #38

rainbow arrow KittyWampus Apr 2015 #57

Yes. The freak out here is amusing. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #64

I like yours best.. it's great how you can do that, Agschimid Me don't like red. Cha Apr 2015 #24

You SAY it's Blue, but I say it's white and gold... brooklynite Apr 2015 #61

Sorry, love marym625 Apr 2015 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author KMOD Apr 2015 #4

There is absolutely no way marym625 Apr 2015 #10

I'm pretty sure it's meant to be forward. nt BainsBane Apr 2015 #37

I'm sure it does marym625 Apr 2015 #56

If logos don't matter then why do they have them? nt Logical Apr 2015 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author KMOD Apr 2015 #6

As it should be with most people... Agschmid Apr 2015 #8

It reflects badly on her team. Another run at the presidency JimDandy Apr 2015 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author KMOD Apr 2015 #29

I hope Hillary, at least, is taking the criticism of her logo JimDandy Apr 2015 #33

This message was self-deleted by its author KMOD Apr 2015 #36

You really don't get it. JimDandy Apr 2015 #39

This message was self-deleted by its author KMOD Apr 2015 #41

Have you served on a dem candidate's election team? JimDandy Apr 2015 #46

This message was self-deleted by its author KMOD Apr 2015 #48

Got to turn in for the night JimDandy Apr 2015 #49

This message was self-deleted by its author KMOD Apr 2015 #52

Art for Art's sake? Action_Patrol Apr 2015 #9

SOCIAL. MEDIA. nt justiceischeap Apr 2015 #63

Some may see a wide range difference between "extremely important" and don't matter." LanternWaste Apr 2015 #66

What's wrong with her logo? JaneyVee Apr 2015 #11

Umm... Fearless Apr 2015 #32

I voted no Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2015 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author KMOD Apr 2015 #15

an arrow pointing to the right is PERFECT for her!! m-lekktor Apr 2015 #16

What me worry olddots Apr 2015 #17

Yes I base all my choices on brand recognition. Rex Apr 2015 #23

I dunno.. I sure fell in love with Cha Apr 2015 #25

This message was self-deleted by its author KMOD Apr 2015 #26

So Awesome and always will be! Cha Apr 2015 #27

That is the best one ever, grapically, at least in my lifetime. JimDandy Apr 2015 #30

Who here actually liked the new Democratic Party logo? Fearless Apr 2015 #31

Some people readily adopted it Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #40

It was very utilitarian to me. I liked the old one. Fearless Apr 2015 #42

The old one was definitely much better Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #45

There is only ONE thing more important ... NanceGreggs Apr 2015 #34

This message was self-deleted by its author KMOD Apr 2015 #43

Oh, you missed me? NanceGreggs Apr 2015 #47

This message was self-deleted by its author KMOD Apr 2015 #51

LOL! Welcome back Nance! leftofcool Apr 2015 #55

Good to see you back. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #65

Yes! If an arrow is pointing right, they won't get my vote BainsBane Apr 2015 #35

This message was self-deleted by its author KMOD Apr 2015 #44

Don't you mean, "Damn RIGHT!" graegoyle Apr 2015 #50

This message was self-deleted by its author KMOD Apr 2015 #53

They have logos? Angleae Apr 2015 #54

wish there was a selection for getting time back that was lost venturing into this thread DrDan Apr 2015 #58

The whole concept of a candidate logo is offensive. LWolf Apr 2015 #59

I think it's -possibly- suggestive of more important things HereSince1628 Apr 2015 #60

I'm not wearing any pants, either. kentauros Apr 2015 #62

unless it has swastika in it or some other offensive symbol - I don't think I would even notice Douglas Carpenter Apr 2015 #67

I voted Yes. There just happens to be things in this world that are more important... BlueJazz Apr 2015 #68

Of all the logos I've ever seen, Hillary's is the only one that has ever made me wonder. nt Zorra Apr 2015 #69