Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fast Track Bill Would Legitimize White House Secrecy and Clear the Way for Anti-User Trade Deals [View all]Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)41. AFL-CIO: "TPP Job Claims Earn 4 Pinocchios!" :
TPP Job Claims Earn 4 Pinocchios!

U.S. workers should beware of promises that the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) will create jobs. When evaluating the recent Obama administration claim that the TPP will create 650,000 jobs, the Washington Posts Fact Checker gave it the lowest possible rating of Four Pinocchiosaka Whopper. Fact Checker editor Glenn Kessler wrote:
Be wary whenever a politician claims a policy will yield bountiful jobs. In this case, the correct number is zero, not 650,000, according to the very study used to calculate this number. Administration officials earn Four Pinocchios for their fishy math.
We agree. After asking the administration for more than four years for information on expected jobs gains from the TPPby industry and geographywe have still not received any information. Given the job performance of prior so-called free trade agreements (FTAs) such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (nearly 700,000 jobs lost) and the U.S.-Korea FTA (60,000 jobs lost), we view any promises about trade and job creation with extreme skepticism. And so should we all.
Read the complete article here.
http://www.aflcio.org/Blog/Political-Action-Legislation/TPP-Job-Claims-Earn-4-Pinocchios
Here's more from the AFL-CIO YouTube Channel:
And more:
AFL-CIO: Tell Congress Fast Track Is a Bad Deal
04/02/2015

When Congress returns from its Easter/Passover recess, it will continue its debate on Fast Track trade authority for the Trans-Pacific Partnership and try to rush it to a vote as soon as possible. Thats why your lawmakers need to hear from you that Fast Track is a mistake we cant afford to make. . . . . . . Click here to contact your representatives now and tell them to stand up for workers and democracy by opposing Fast Track when it comes to a congressional vote.
Fast Track is an extreme deal written by the big banks and big corporations. Wall Street says that Fast Track and bad trade deals will create jobs and that we dont want China to write the rules. But allowing closed-door negotiations of trade deals that affect real working people like you and me rigs the rules for global corporations and leaves us behind. It is a mistake that we cant afford to make again. . . . . . . . . Fast Track and the bad trade deals that will follow wont create American jobs. When trade deals are fast tracked, jobs go overseas, increased safety measures go out the window and workers wages go down. And that cant happen--because America's workers support trade, too.
Its time for Congress to put working families first. Working families deserve a trade policy that encourages an open-door, democratic process available to all, not just the 1%.
Also you can sign the AFL-CIO's Fast Track petition.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fast Track Bill Would Legitimize White House Secrecy and Clear the Way for Anti-User Trade Deals [View all]
Faryn Balyncd
Apr 2015
OP
I just wish the defenders would choose between "this is good for American workers" and
djean111
Apr 2015
#3
They sure do seem to vacillate between those two memes a lot, don't they?
Populist_Prole
Apr 2015
#26
it's the same group that insists, "Hillary is really liberal", and "of course she's not
Doctor_J
Apr 2015
#67
It's trying to put in place many ways to bypass what our founders had intended for passing treaties
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#8
W Post: Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty will help neither workers nor consumers
Omaha Steve
Apr 2015
#47
The negotiations are secret for the same reason the Iran nuclear deal was secret.
randome
Apr 2015
#20
Exactly. If we had told the other 11 parties to the TPP negotiations that our Congress
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#34
I think you are confused. More Republicans than Democrats are supporting Obama pushing the TPP...
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#61
Exactly. If Congress doesn't like some portion, they just say No, and Obama either
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#28
I'm really surprised people aren't getting this. It's really depressing and doesn't bode well for
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#33
The Republican party is in favor of universal wage floors, universal working condition protections,
Fumesucker
Apr 2015
#38
Yes, and you've "decided" to support the same treaty that Republicans and Corporations support
LondonReign2
Apr 2015
#43
When the track record is that of "trade" agreements not delivering on their promises,
Faryn Balyncd
Apr 2015
#50
when will it be "released to the public for approval"? and how does "the public" go about
ND-Dem
Apr 2015
#29
The same way we approve or disapprove of anything -through our representatives.
randome
Apr 2015
#52
i see: when it comes to an up or down vote, that's the first we'll here of this thousands
ND-Dem
Apr 2015
#65
Well, at least we can dispense with the BS that the text won't be released to the public.
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#31