Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
41. AFL-CIO: "TPP Job Claims Earn 4 Pinocchios!" :
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 12:49 PM
Apr 2015





TPP Job Claims Earn 4 Pinocchios!





U.S. workers should beware of promises that the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) will create jobs. When evaluating the recent Obama administration claim that the TPP will create 650,000 jobs, the Washington Post’s Fact Checker gave it the lowest possible rating of Four Pinocchios—aka “Whopper.” Fact Checker editor Glenn Kessler wrote:

Be wary whenever a politician claims a policy will yield bountiful jobs. In this case, the correct number is zero, not 650,000, according to the very study used to calculate this number. Administration officials earn Four Pinocchios for their fishy math.

We agree. After asking the administration for more than four years for information on expected jobs gains from the TPP—by industry and geography—we have still not received any information. Given the job performance of prior so-called “free trade agreements” (FTAs) such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (nearly 700,000 jobs lost) and the U.S.-Korea FTA (60,000 jobs lost), we view any promises about trade and job creation with extreme skepticism. And so should we all.

Read the complete article here.


http://www.aflcio.org/Blog/Political-Action-Legislation/TPP-Job-Claims-Earn-4-Pinocchios







Here's more from the AFL-CIO YouTube Channel:









And more:







AFL-CIO: Tell Congress Fast Track Is a Bad Deal


04/02/2015





When Congress returns from its Easter/Passover recess, it will continue its debate on Fast Track trade authority for the Trans-Pacific Partnership and try to rush it to a vote as soon as possible. That’s why your lawmakers need to hear from you that Fast Track is a mistake we can’t afford to make. . . . . . . Click here to contact your representatives now and tell them to stand up for workers and democracy by opposing Fast Track when it comes to a congressional vote.

Fast Track is an extreme deal written by the big banks and big corporations. Wall Street says that Fast Track and bad trade deals will create jobs and that we don’t want China to write the rules. But allowing closed-door negotiations of trade deals that affect real working people like you and me rigs the rules for global corporations and leaves us behind. It is a mistake that we can’t afford to make again. . . . . . . . . Fast Track and the bad trade deals that will follow won’t create American jobs. When trade deals are fast tracked, jobs go overseas, increased safety measures go out the window and workers’ wages go down. And that can’t happen--because America's workers support trade, too.

It’s time for Congress to put working families first. Working families deserve a trade policy that encourages an open-door, democratic process available to all, not just the 1%.

Also you can sign the AFL-CIO's Fast Track petition.


















Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

'Chief Transparency Officer' seems pretty 1984ish. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #1
It certainly is. Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #2
I just wish the defenders would choose between "this is good for American workers" and djean111 Apr 2015 #3
What about Paul Krugman who basically says, "Meh."? randome Apr 2015 #5
We have been running that race to the bottom now for a while zeemike Apr 2015 #7
They sure do seem to vacillate between those two memes a lot, don't they? Populist_Prole Apr 2015 #26
Nothing "liberal" about this, dgibby Apr 2015 #35
it's the same group that insists, "Hillary is really liberal", and "of course she's not Doctor_J Apr 2015 #67
I expected better of people who write for a living. randome Apr 2015 #4
It's trying to put in place many ways to bypass what our founders had intended for passing treaties cascadiance Apr 2015 #8
Well said. n/t fasttense Apr 2015 #12
I would vote Punx Apr 2015 #22
Yet you can't state WHY it's a bad bill. randome Apr 2015 #23
W Post: Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty will help neither workers nor consumers Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #47
Do you think Treaties are, or have been, worked out by Congress? ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #27
Or how I learned to stop worrying and love the TPP. zeemike Apr 2015 #10
The negotiations are secret for the same reason the Iran nuclear deal was secret. randome Apr 2015 #20
But that's un-democratic ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #30
Sure. Everything our government does should be put up for a vote. randome Apr 2015 #56
So moved. Is there a second? ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #60
Exactly. If we had told the other 11 parties to the TPP negotiations that our Congress Hoyt Apr 2015 #34
So our congress is the enemy because they might raise issues zeemike Apr 2015 #40
I sometimes think Congress IS the enemy, at least the Conservative part of it. randome Apr 2015 #58
I think you are confused. More Republicans than Democrats are supporting Obama pushing the TPP... cascadiance Apr 2015 #61
So then, why is OK for corporations to have a hand in writing this but LondonReign2 Apr 2015 #42
It isn't okay, from my point of view. randome Apr 2015 #53
And for that matter environmental groups should also be involved too... cascadiance Apr 2015 #62
WE don't get to see it until FOUR years after it is passed!!! Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #11
No, that four year secrecy regards the negotiations that led to the agreement. randome Apr 2015 #16
OOPS your wrong we don't have to listen to you make stuff up anymore Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #46
Thanks for that link Babel_17 Apr 2015 #64
You seem like a rose colored glasses kind of person. lark Apr 2015 #14
'Astronomically' is a big word in terms of meaning. randome Apr 2015 #18
Yeah, tell me how we've benefited by NAFTA? lark Apr 2015 #21
Obama described the TPP as a 're-write' of NAFTA to address those concerns. randome Apr 2015 #24
Described? lark Apr 2015 #25
Exactly. If Congress doesn't like some portion, they just say No, and Obama either Hoyt Apr 2015 #28
True ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #32
I'm really surprised people aren't getting this. It's really depressing and doesn't bode well for Hoyt Apr 2015 #33
Your right ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #36
The Republican party is in favor of universal wage floors, universal working condition protections, Fumesucker Apr 2015 #38
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #39
Yes, and you've "decided" to support the same treaty that Republicans and Corporations support LondonReign2 Apr 2015 #43
Where have I said anything approaching, "I support the TPP"? ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #45
It's going to be like owning a patent Fumesucker Apr 2015 #48
Who said I favored the TPP? 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #49
AFL-CIO: "TPP Job Claims Earn 4 Pinocchios!" : Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #41
Question ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #44
When the track record is that of "trade" agreements not delivering on their promises, Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #50
Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #51
when will it be "released to the public for approval"? and how does "the public" go about ND-Dem Apr 2015 #29
The same way we approve or disapprove of anything -through our representatives. randome Apr 2015 #52
i see: when it comes to an up or down vote, that's the first we'll here of this thousands ND-Dem Apr 2015 #65
To Piss on the People. TPP.n/t jtuck004 Apr 2015 #6
It's definitely not a traditional "Toilet Paper Party" cascadiance Apr 2015 #9
There is no real trade reason for Obama to be pushing this ghastly deal fasttense Apr 2015 #13
"Who is he paying back with this?" MissDeeds Apr 2015 #15
That's what I want to know also. liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #17
Penny Pritzer? n/t dgibby Apr 2015 #37
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Apr 2015 #19
Well, at least we can dispense with the BS that the text won't be released to the public. Hoyt Apr 2015 #31
YOU said it...PLEASE post the document for us all to read then Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #54
The TPP document says the NEGOTIATING documents should not be declassified, of course they were. Hoyt Apr 2015 #55
From the USTR Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #59
Huh? Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #57
No offense, but the naysayers are only mostly convincing Babel_17 Apr 2015 #63
K&R n/t OhioChick Apr 2015 #66
K&R woo me with science Apr 2015 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fast Track Bill Would Leg...»Reply #41