Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fast Track Bill Would Legitimize White House Secrecy and Clear the Way for Anti-User Trade Deals [View all]Omaha Steve
(109,162 posts)46. OOPS your wrong we don't have to listen to you make stuff up anymore
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trans-pacific-partnership-treaty-will-help-neither-workers-nor-consumers/2015/03/31/145e98ba-d727-11e4-ba28-f2a685dc7f89_story.html
Snip: The brutal negotiations of the TPP havent been about tariffs but about protections and regulations. Last week, the draft chapter concerning the Investor-State Dispute Settlement mechanism was leaked to Wikileaks and the New York Times. Essentially, the chapter allows a company to sue for taxpayer damages if a government (federal, state or local) passes laws or take actions that the company alleges will impinge on future expected profits. The tribunal is a panel of lawyers, drawn from a small group of accredited international lawyers who serve both as judges and advocates. If successful the companies can collect millions in damages from governments. The provisions are so shocking that the TPP mandates that the chapter not be declassified until four years after the TPP goes into force or fails to pass.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fast Track Bill Would Legitimize White House Secrecy and Clear the Way for Anti-User Trade Deals [View all]
Faryn Balyncd
Apr 2015
OP
I just wish the defenders would choose between "this is good for American workers" and
djean111
Apr 2015
#3
They sure do seem to vacillate between those two memes a lot, don't they?
Populist_Prole
Apr 2015
#26
it's the same group that insists, "Hillary is really liberal", and "of course she's not
Doctor_J
Apr 2015
#67
It's trying to put in place many ways to bypass what our founders had intended for passing treaties
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#8
W Post: Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty will help neither workers nor consumers
Omaha Steve
Apr 2015
#47
The negotiations are secret for the same reason the Iran nuclear deal was secret.
randome
Apr 2015
#20
Exactly. If we had told the other 11 parties to the TPP negotiations that our Congress
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#34
I think you are confused. More Republicans than Democrats are supporting Obama pushing the TPP...
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#61
Exactly. If Congress doesn't like some portion, they just say No, and Obama either
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#28
I'm really surprised people aren't getting this. It's really depressing and doesn't bode well for
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#33
The Republican party is in favor of universal wage floors, universal working condition protections,
Fumesucker
Apr 2015
#38
Yes, and you've "decided" to support the same treaty that Republicans and Corporations support
LondonReign2
Apr 2015
#43
When the track record is that of "trade" agreements not delivering on their promises,
Faryn Balyncd
Apr 2015
#50
when will it be "released to the public for approval"? and how does "the public" go about
ND-Dem
Apr 2015
#29
The same way we approve or disapprove of anything -through our representatives.
randome
Apr 2015
#52
i see: when it comes to an up or down vote, that's the first we'll here of this thousands
ND-Dem
Apr 2015
#65
Well, at least we can dispense with the BS that the text won't be released to the public.
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#31