Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fast Track Bill Would Legitimize White House Secrecy and Clear the Way for Anti-User Trade Deals [View all]Omaha Steve
(108,994 posts)47. W Post: Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty will help neither workers nor consumers
What have you got that says this will be so great?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trans-pacific-partnership-treaty-will-help-neither-workers-nor-consumers/2015/03/31/145e98ba-d727-11e4-ba28-f2a685dc7f89_story.html
By Katrina vanden Heuvel March 31
China wants to write the rules for the worlds fastest-growing region We should write those rules, President Obama declared in his State of the Union address. To sell Congress on giving him authority to fast track consideration of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a trade and investment treaty with 12 nations that has been under negotiation for five years, the president argues it is vital that we write the rules. The real question, of course, is what does he mean by we?
Our global trade and tax policies have been and still are controlled by corporate and financial interests. They, not workers or consumers, write the rules. In the early post-World War II years, trade treaties were focused on lowering tariffs. In theory at least, workers in both nations might benefit from larger markets and increased trade. But now a significant portion of our trade is intra-corporate trade, an exchange between one branch of a multinational and another. Multinationals have different interests than national companies. They profit even if U.S. workers suffer. Increasingly companies choose to report their profits or ship their jobs to countries with the lowest standards where the legal position of companies is the strongest. Companies like Wal-Mart set up global distribution systems designed to drive down wages here and abroad. The Waltons are the richest family in the world. Their workers are paid so little that they are forced to rely on taxpayer subsidies like Medicaid and food stamps.
One product of the corporate-defined trade rules is that the United States has run unprecedented trade deficits, totaling more than $8 trillion since 2000 alone. Trade deficits cost jobs. Worse, companies have used the threat to move jobs abroad to drive down wages here at home. Our corporate-defined trade policies contribute significantly to the reality that, as Nobel Prize economist Joseph Stiglitz writes, the real median income of a full time male worker is lower now than it was 40 years ago.
With tariffs already low, current trade treaties are focused less on tariffs and trade than on harmonizing regulations for investors. But these regulations concern worker rights, consumer and environmental protections, economic policies that are the expression of our democracy. Too often, harmonization is simply an excuse for corporations to institute a race to the bottom.
FULL story at link.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fast Track Bill Would Legitimize White House Secrecy and Clear the Way for Anti-User Trade Deals [View all]
Faryn Balyncd
Apr 2015
OP
I just wish the defenders would choose between "this is good for American workers" and
djean111
Apr 2015
#3
They sure do seem to vacillate between those two memes a lot, don't they?
Populist_Prole
Apr 2015
#26
it's the same group that insists, "Hillary is really liberal", and "of course she's not
Doctor_J
Apr 2015
#67
It's trying to put in place many ways to bypass what our founders had intended for passing treaties
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#8
W Post: Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty will help neither workers nor consumers
Omaha Steve
Apr 2015
#47
The negotiations are secret for the same reason the Iran nuclear deal was secret.
randome
Apr 2015
#20
Exactly. If we had told the other 11 parties to the TPP negotiations that our Congress
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#34
I think you are confused. More Republicans than Democrats are supporting Obama pushing the TPP...
cascadiance
Apr 2015
#61
Exactly. If Congress doesn't like some portion, they just say No, and Obama either
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#28
I'm really surprised people aren't getting this. It's really depressing and doesn't bode well for
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#33
The Republican party is in favor of universal wage floors, universal working condition protections,
Fumesucker
Apr 2015
#38
Yes, and you've "decided" to support the same treaty that Republicans and Corporations support
LondonReign2
Apr 2015
#43
When the track record is that of "trade" agreements not delivering on their promises,
Faryn Balyncd
Apr 2015
#50
when will it be "released to the public for approval"? and how does "the public" go about
ND-Dem
Apr 2015
#29
The same way we approve or disapprove of anything -through our representatives.
randome
Apr 2015
#52
i see: when it comes to an up or down vote, that's the first we'll here of this thousands
ND-Dem
Apr 2015
#65
Well, at least we can dispense with the BS that the text won't be released to the public.
Hoyt
Apr 2015
#31