Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(109,123 posts)
59. From the USTR
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:46 PM
Apr 2015

https://ustr.gov/issue-areas/labor (copyright exempt)

Labor
Protecting labor rights is a core priority of President Obama’s trade agenda, and the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is at the forefront of the Administration’s efforts to improve labor laws and working conditions with trading partners in virtually every region of the globe. The Obama Administration is committed to using the full range of tools that are available – whether under trade agreements, trade preference programs, or through multilateral fora – to protect the rights of workers around the globe. These efforts have helped to level the playing field for American workers and businesses by building strong and enforceable labor standards.

Negotiating high labor standards in trade agreements: USTR is leading the Obama Administration’s efforts to negotiate the strongest labor protections ever negotiated in trade agreements anywhere in the world. USTR’s approach in the Trans-Pacific Partnership and Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership not only incorporates commitments to adopt and maintain fundamental labor rights, as recognized by the International Labor Organization, and to effectively enforce labor laws, but also includes first-ever commitments on forced labor and acceptable conditions of work.

Securing labor rights through monitoring and enforcement of trade agreements: USTR’s Labor Office monitors adherence to labor rights provisions of existing bilateral and regional trade agreements and holds countries accountable for upholding their labor commitments. Learn more about USTR's monitoring and enforcement actions, here.

Public submission process under trade agreements: USTR works with the Department of Labor to review public submissions filed under free trade agreements and to engage governments in an effort to address concerns raised through the submission process. Learn more about the submission process and current submissions, here.

Upholding worker rights in trade preference program countries USTR monitors and enforces countries’ adherence to worker rights criteria under trade preference programs, including Generalized System of Preference (GSP), African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI), and Haiti HOPE.

Promoting Trade and Labor around the Globe: Leading the effort to develop positions and build international consensus on trade and labor issues in regional and bilateral and multilateral fora. Read more about the fundamental labor rights of the International Labor Organization (ILO), here.

Promoting Public Participation: Alongside the U.S. Department of Labor, USTR co-chairs the Labor Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiations and Trade Policy (LAC). The LAC is comprised of members of the U.S. labor community and advises, consults with, and makes recommendations to the United States Trade Representative and the Secretary of Labor, on general trade and labor policy matters, including the negotiation and implementation of trade agreements.

From Labor: The A.F.L.-C.I.O., on the Trans-Pacific Partnership APRIL 13, 2015

To the Editor:

Roger C. Altman and Richard N. Haass (“Why the Asian Trade Deal Matters,” Op-Ed, April 4) express confidence that the inclusion of international labor rights protections will adequately protect workers in the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership. But despite good-faith attempts to strengthen labor protections, the sad truth is that these provisions have been ineffective and intolerably slow at addressing even the most egregious infractions.

Ignoring a raging controversy about proposed new investor rights, Mr. Altman and Mr. Haass inexplicably state that nothing in the accord “would affect existing environmental dispute-resolution mechanisms.” According to the WikiLeaks version of the classified draft TPP investment chapter, this is not the case.

The writers also say the International Monetary Fund “should remain the venue for challenging” suspected currency manipulation. But the I.M.F. has utterly failed to exercise any effective authority in this area. And it is small consolation that China, “widely seen as the main culprit,” is not currently part of the TPP. China may join at a future date.

A broad and unprecedented coalition — of labor, environmental, consumer, public health, small business, family farm and human rights organizations — has raised serious concerns about the trade accord. The writers’ blithe dismissal of these critics does not accord with the actual provisions under consideration and betrays a misreading of history.

THEA LEE

Deputy Chief of Staff, A.F.L.-C.I.O.

Washington

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

'Chief Transparency Officer' seems pretty 1984ish. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #1
It certainly is. Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #2
I just wish the defenders would choose between "this is good for American workers" and djean111 Apr 2015 #3
What about Paul Krugman who basically says, "Meh."? randome Apr 2015 #5
We have been running that race to the bottom now for a while zeemike Apr 2015 #7
They sure do seem to vacillate between those two memes a lot, don't they? Populist_Prole Apr 2015 #26
Nothing "liberal" about this, dgibby Apr 2015 #35
it's the same group that insists, "Hillary is really liberal", and "of course she's not Doctor_J Apr 2015 #67
I expected better of people who write for a living. randome Apr 2015 #4
It's trying to put in place many ways to bypass what our founders had intended for passing treaties cascadiance Apr 2015 #8
Well said. n/t fasttense Apr 2015 #12
I would vote Punx Apr 2015 #22
Yet you can't state WHY it's a bad bill. randome Apr 2015 #23
W Post: Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty will help neither workers nor consumers Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #47
Do you think Treaties are, or have been, worked out by Congress? ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #27
Or how I learned to stop worrying and love the TPP. zeemike Apr 2015 #10
The negotiations are secret for the same reason the Iran nuclear deal was secret. randome Apr 2015 #20
But that's un-democratic ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #30
Sure. Everything our government does should be put up for a vote. randome Apr 2015 #56
So moved. Is there a second? ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #60
Exactly. If we had told the other 11 parties to the TPP negotiations that our Congress Hoyt Apr 2015 #34
So our congress is the enemy because they might raise issues zeemike Apr 2015 #40
I sometimes think Congress IS the enemy, at least the Conservative part of it. randome Apr 2015 #58
I think you are confused. More Republicans than Democrats are supporting Obama pushing the TPP... cascadiance Apr 2015 #61
So then, why is OK for corporations to have a hand in writing this but LondonReign2 Apr 2015 #42
It isn't okay, from my point of view. randome Apr 2015 #53
And for that matter environmental groups should also be involved too... cascadiance Apr 2015 #62
WE don't get to see it until FOUR years after it is passed!!! Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #11
No, that four year secrecy regards the negotiations that led to the agreement. randome Apr 2015 #16
OOPS your wrong we don't have to listen to you make stuff up anymore Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #46
Thanks for that link Babel_17 Apr 2015 #64
You seem like a rose colored glasses kind of person. lark Apr 2015 #14
'Astronomically' is a big word in terms of meaning. randome Apr 2015 #18
Yeah, tell me how we've benefited by NAFTA? lark Apr 2015 #21
Obama described the TPP as a 're-write' of NAFTA to address those concerns. randome Apr 2015 #24
Described? lark Apr 2015 #25
Exactly. If Congress doesn't like some portion, they just say No, and Obama either Hoyt Apr 2015 #28
True ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #32
I'm really surprised people aren't getting this. It's really depressing and doesn't bode well for Hoyt Apr 2015 #33
Your right ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #36
The Republican party is in favor of universal wage floors, universal working condition protections, Fumesucker Apr 2015 #38
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #39
Yes, and you've "decided" to support the same treaty that Republicans and Corporations support LondonReign2 Apr 2015 #43
Where have I said anything approaching, "I support the TPP"? ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #45
It's going to be like owning a patent Fumesucker Apr 2015 #48
Who said I favored the TPP? 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #49
AFL-CIO: "TPP Job Claims Earn 4 Pinocchios!" : Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #41
Question ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #44
When the track record is that of "trade" agreements not delivering on their promises, Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #50
Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2015 #51
when will it be "released to the public for approval"? and how does "the public" go about ND-Dem Apr 2015 #29
The same way we approve or disapprove of anything -through our representatives. randome Apr 2015 #52
i see: when it comes to an up or down vote, that's the first we'll here of this thousands ND-Dem Apr 2015 #65
To Piss on the People. TPP.n/t jtuck004 Apr 2015 #6
It's definitely not a traditional "Toilet Paper Party" cascadiance Apr 2015 #9
There is no real trade reason for Obama to be pushing this ghastly deal fasttense Apr 2015 #13
"Who is he paying back with this?" MissDeeds Apr 2015 #15
That's what I want to know also. liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #17
Penny Pritzer? n/t dgibby Apr 2015 #37
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Apr 2015 #19
Well, at least we can dispense with the BS that the text won't be released to the public. Hoyt Apr 2015 #31
YOU said it...PLEASE post the document for us all to read then Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #54
The TPP document says the NEGOTIATING documents should not be declassified, of course they were. Hoyt Apr 2015 #55
From the USTR Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #59
Huh? Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #57
No offense, but the naysayers are only mostly convincing Babel_17 Apr 2015 #63
K&R n/t OhioChick Apr 2015 #66
K&R woo me with science Apr 2015 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fast Track Bill Would Leg...»Reply #59