General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Wall Street. But I am afraid that's not enough. She isn't progressive on the economy, foreign policy or the heavy handed NSA/CIA Security State. So while the LGBT community and women may gain important rights, we may all find ourselves unemployed, without pensions, and without any social nets. We have to regulate Wall Street or we will completely lose all our wealth. We must get Goldman-Sachs and Wall Street to pay their share of infrastructure repairs and rebuilds. I don't see H. Clinton taking on Wall Street and Goldman-Sachs.
H. Clinton fails the progressive test with regard to the TPP and let's face it, this "agreement" may well be the stake thru the heart of the middle and working classes. This "agreement" is essentially "trickle-down" with a bow. "Give corporations more power and they will take good care of you."
Sen Sanders is a progressive and H. Clinton is no Sen Sanders.