Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FSogol

(47,543 posts)

18. Seriously.

Reply to SidDithers (Reply #8)

Mon Apr 20, 2015, 07:33 PM

Apr 2015

x 100

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How will Hillary defend the Nato bombing of Libya now that people are drowning in the Mediterranean [View all] betterdemsonly Apr 2015 OP

Perhaps no more than you need to explain on why this question was ask. Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #1

Much better to have Gadaffi kill a few at a time? brooklynite Apr 2015 #3

How do you know they weren't isis troublemakers? n/t betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #10

How do you know they were? FarPoint Apr 2015 #22

why do we have any obligation to support wars in other countries we betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #23

+1000 Truth is, we need to use the military stuff we have, not "waste" the trillions. libdem4life Apr 2015 #25

They are mostly Libyan and Syrian refugees. betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #2

Benghazi!!!1!1 tritsofme Apr 2015 #4

Yes, her enabling of the neocons did nothing to stop them making up betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #7

Could you provide a list of the neocons she enabled? DURHAM D Apr 2015 #14

Start with Victoria Nuland and Robert Kagan. betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #15

Okay. I get it. DURHAM D Apr 2015 #24

I don't get you? betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #33

google it DURHAM D Apr 2015 #36

when was the kidnapping outed as fraud ? JI7 Apr 2015 #6

It was the Sunnies not the Shias. betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #9

It didn't fuel anything JI7 Apr 2015 #12

It fuelled our rush to arm the socalled "Syrian moderates" betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #13

wrong. the 'Arab Spring' movement was ongoing , quadrature Apr 2015 #16

Syria was already a war zone when Engel was kidnapped JI7 Apr 2015 #19

but we hadn't funded the "Syrian opposition" betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #21

Without American weaponry these two movements would have gone nowhere betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #20

Oh FFS... SidDithers Apr 2015 #8

the libyan bombings are a real fuckup betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #11

Seriously. FSogol Apr 2015 #18

Uh huh. zappaman Apr 2015 #17

Don't you mean? BainsBane Apr 2015 #26

Really? FFS! hrmjustin Apr 2015 #27

By asking us if we prefer there to be dictators across north Africa so that desperate refugees can pampango Apr 2015 #28

This sounds like RW logic. DCBob Apr 2015 #29

Only to people who confuse notions of left and right with partisan needs n/t betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #30

Odd how some people don't see a connection from the NATO actions in Libya to a refugee crisis... Cheese Sandwich Apr 2015 #31

There is a personal stake in not connecting the dots. n/t betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #35

She can always point out the pressure from the GOP like McCain, Graham, Cruz and others. kelliekat44 Apr 2015 #32

Maybe true, but McCain lost so Obama and Hillary betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #34

FOX says "What's done is done " and Kucinich isn't running jakeXT Apr 2015 #37