Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Thug is the New N$&%er - A discussion [View all]Vinca
(53,712 posts)48. I don't think so if I'm reading the wordphobia police correctly.
If you call a white a thug it MIGHT BE CONSTRUED as calling him one of the other guys who Emily Post says we can no longer call thugs. Even though they might loot, pillage and set fires, apparently they are just "misunderstood youth."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If this is the worst thing happening in your day, you probably have a pretty unaffected life.
Starry Messenger
May 2015
#8
I've never mentioned banning a word. I'm pointing out its racist use, pursuant to the OP.
cyberswede
May 2015
#25
I'm not the one assigning racial intent to the use...those using it as a dog whistle are.
cyberswede
May 2015
#47
I've heard the way they use it on Fox News and it is racist when used like that
Cheese Sandwich
May 2015
#15
I hope the "intolerant morons" you're referring to are those who use it as a dog whistle
cyberswede
May 2015
#31
That's what happens with language. Words acquire connotations through their usage.
DanTex
May 2015
#28
Context matters. It's clear that there are people who use the word as a dog whistle,
petronius
May 2015
#38