Where's the Second Amendment advocates in the Freddie Grey case?

[friendly_iconoclast]

24. Sad to see this nonsense still getting traction at DU

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=153756

"The Dred Scott decision was passed, in part, to prevent slaves from owning guns."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/117273773

And if that wasn't enough for you, allow me to quote Chief Justice Roger Taney
in the Dred Scott decision:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford#cite_note-22

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem/llst:@field%28DOCID+@lit%28llst022div3%29%29

More especially, it cannot be believed that the large slaveholding States regarded them as included in the word citizens, or would have consented to a Constitution which might compel them to receive them in that character from another State. For if they were so received, and entitled to the privileges and immunities of citizens, it would exempt them from the operation of the special laws and from the police regulations which they considered to be necessary for their own satiety. It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognized as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished; and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went. And all of this would be done in the face of the subject race of the same color, both free and slaves, and inevitably producing discontent and insubordination among them, and endangering the peace and safety of the State.