General Discussion

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)

38. Sure.

Mon May 4, 2015, 08:15 AM

May 2015

Assuming people take the interest to scroll down to the footer, click a footer link, and load the page. The dynamic email pages and donation pages are a lot harder to serve than static about pages and issues pages.

I think we're over analyzing this. I call it an innocent oversight. Everyone else calls it everything from intentional due to old pages, to preventing DOS. C'mon, Occams razor please? The "old pages" argument is actually the most logical, it's just unfortunate they use the same CSS and styling and footer on most of those pages. Just throw the footer on the main page. It's really not that big of a deal, because 90% of people aren't going to click footer links.

It's not that big of a deal especially because of the coming soon thing, the real site launches the 26th when the campaign truly kicks off.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

berniesanders.com has no content really... [View all] msongs May 2015 OP

Try his senate page Koinos May 2015 #1

okthks.was at a dem convention yesterday and wanted to make a shirt with official looking stuff msongs May 2015 #2

I find a lot of content on there... Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #3

did you give money already then? those are NOT available after giving email address which leads to msongs May 2015 #5

yep Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #14

That's a good web strategy alcibiades_mystery May 2015 #17

Unnecessary. joshcryer May 2015 #21

I think they disabled it on purpose temporarily to reduce the traffic Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #22

It looks like the footer on the main page is broken. joshcryer May 2015 #15

On a hunch, I found some content there by adding "/issues" to the url. greyl May 2015 #4

There IS content...it's just not linked to the home page... brooklynite May 2015 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author Bjorn Against May 2015 #7

It's likely an oversight. joshcryer May 2015 #16

But why should they expect people would contribute before acquainting themselves pnwmom May 2015 #24

I've never been to a political site that didn't spam that. joshcryer May 2015 #25

You can get into Hillary's site by giving an email address, and see content pnwmom May 2015 #28

You don't even need to give an email. joshcryer May 2015 #30

You can see her content, but there is no substance there. morningfog May 2015 #40

He has a Senate site also Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #27

What a hypocritical thing to say. morningfog May 2015 #39

I had this discussion with others in another thread. TM99 May 2015 #8

it doesn't work for me. This morning it was domain suspended and now it's a 403 error. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #9

It is up currently. TM99 May 2015 #10

Third time's a charm - now it's working lumberjack_jeff May 2015 #11

Glad you got in. TM99 May 2015 #12

For what it's worth they do have "coming 5.26.2015" on there. joshcryer May 2015 #18

True. TM99 May 2015 #23

Um, the home page says "Bernie Sanders for President | Coming 5.26.15 phleshdef May 2015 #13

Hopefully, they have the Bernie White House.gov site up on inauguration day alcibiades_mystery May 2015 #19

Heh, saw that before I saw your post. joshcryer May 2015 #20

It's like that on purpose. They know it's like that. Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #26

Link? joshcryer May 2015 #29

It seems fine to me... Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #31

Can you post the email? joshcryer May 2015 #32

No thanks. Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #33

Please don't think that way. joshcryer May 2015 #34

'Fixing it would be a one line piece of code' Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #35

It's like ten pages. joshcryer May 2015 #36

It's not a matter of 'how many pages', it's a matter of how many people are hitting it. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #37

Sure. joshcryer May 2015 #38

I know, right? MadrasT May 2015 #41