Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
19. 1. he is not pitting feminist against feminist? sure sounds that way to me.
Wed May 6, 2015, 10:33 AM
May 2015

2. calling and calidating nad dismissing calling women slut and whore sure in hell not banding together. to tit for tat?

3. no. i did not make that accusation. you may have read it, but i clearly did not think he was the one to say that, and you need to re read my words. i was wanting to know what he did, to get the feminists riled, not seeing it in the story.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Aw, I guess that banned troll was wrong. cyberswede May 2015 #1
i do not think i get this story and what is happening. i never follow this shit. seabeyond May 2015 #12
you know what cyberswede. very interesting. seabeyond May 2015 #14
Ironic that so many dedicated feminists fell for MRA talking points. Doctor_J May 2015 #35
Do you mean in that thread? cyberswede May 2015 #37
Most, yeah, but Doctor_J May 2015 #45
Then you should rethink your post. NCTraveler May 2015 #54
well... cyberswede May 2015 #57
all i am seeing is the men called the female character a slut. people didnt like that. now they seabeyond May 2015 #2
Who called the female character a slut specifically? el_bryanto May 2015 #4
all we get is his whine about the mean feminist picking on him. i for one, am curious WHY seabeyond May 2015 #5
OK - but let me ask this again - Joss Whedon - the person who this article is about el_bryanto May 2015 #7
we do NOT know. in this enlightening story, all we hear is his whine about the mean feminist. seabeyond May 2015 #8
A few points el_bryanto May 2015 #16
1. he is not pitting feminist against feminist? sure sounds that way to me. seabeyond May 2015 #19
OK - reconcile 2 and 3 el_bryanto May 2015 #21
only learning the story as we go. if he has a long history of supporting feminist, one would think seabeyond May 2015 #22
He does have a history of supporting feminists. That's why I found sufrommich May 2015 #25
good for him. i for one, appreciate his voice. nt seabeyond May 2015 #43
If you don't have the information - why are you on the attack? el_bryanto May 2015 #28
oh. stop. i have clearly put out my position step by step. and it matters. i have been honest seabeyond May 2015 #38
There's a difference between treating someone with kid gloves and being accurate el_bryanto May 2015 #39
i do not think you are ACCURATELY portraying what i have said. meh. seabeyond May 2015 #44
Your initial statement el_bryanto May 2015 #52
ya. so? that is what i READ in the article. that is what happened. seabeyond May 2015 #53
OK el_bryanto May 2015 #56
that is all you had to say, instead of hunt things to attack me on. and that still does not address seabeyond May 2015 #58
and. was he pitting feminist against feminist in that statement? that is everything he accuses seabeyond May 2015 #24
Hmm... Orrex May 2015 #40
Actually they were calling a cartoon character a slut. yeoman6987 May 2015 #26
really? lmfao. guy. thank you so much for your help seabeyond May 2015 #29
Hey anytime. I just like information to be factual and true. yeoman6987 May 2015 #33
they may not get to define Snow Leopard May 2015 #74
as they get to call someone a slut, others get to call them misogynist assholes. why their fee fees seabeyond May 2015 #75
it was my impression it Snow Leopard May 2015 #83
no surprise you fail to see, .... seabeyond May 2015 #84
And Jeremy Renner just doubled down on his fauxpology KitSileya May 2015 #11
Did you see the movie? I didn't. No interest at all. yeoman6987 May 2015 #27
Yes, I saw it, and it was a mess. KitSileya May 2015 #55
Since you enjoy them or at least the last one. yeoman6987 May 2015 #69
he's overcompensating in an effort to stay in the closet. geek tragedy May 2015 #50
Speculating whether Renner is in the closet is immaterial. KitSileya May 2015 #60
not defending it. merely explaining. geek tragedy May 2015 #65
Really, Geek? Your comment seems a bit tawdry. Comrade Grumpy May 2015 #61
he's engaging in stereotypical hypermasculine/machismo behavior geek tragedy May 2015 #67
ok. gotcha. and ya. and thanks. nt seabeyond May 2015 #70
Jeremy Renner's turned out to be a giant douchecanoe. backscatter712 May 2015 #80
Hah! So many people needed this to be true Starry Messenger May 2015 #3
i do not follow this shit. i am not sure i am getting what happened. nt seabeyond May 2015 #6
I googled it. Apparently Renner got called out on Twitter for calling the Black Widow character octoberlib May 2015 #15
joke, off color whatever. shut the fuck up and take it... *. those damn sjw. seabeyond May 2015 #17
Yep. Apparently it should be okay to use those terms if the female in question octoberlib May 2015 #18
Hopefully as punishment they never make another yeoman6987 May 2015 #31
So what sort of movies should be permitted? nt el_bryanto May 2015 #41
I liked furious 7. Very good movie with zero sexism yeoman6987 May 2015 #68
I don't want them not to make another. I want them to do better. KitSileya May 2015 #73
Nothing happened. Starry Messenger May 2015 #46
thank you. ya. we have some jabs at sjw as not even warranting lip service, in this thread. seabeyond May 2015 #47
This. nt sufrommich May 2015 #49
hmm... chervilant May 2015 #9
its sounding like he is claiming feminism. we have a sect of feminist men think calling women sluts seabeyond May 2015 #10
I was going to add chervilant May 2015 #13
Well Twitter in general is pretty useless el_bryanto May 2015 #20
His comment chervilant May 2015 #32
OK - that's bullshit. el_bryanto May 2015 #36
i get that style of addressing the issue, if that was the intent. militant feminist is also a dog seabeyond May 2015 #42
oic chervilant May 2015 #71
Well, Bryant, chervilant May 2015 #72
I've tried to be civil - but it's kind of pointless on this board sometimes. el_bryanto May 2015 #76
Civility is seldom pointless, chervilant May 2015 #78
Weadon has a history of being supportive of feminism ismnotwasm May 2015 #23
There are some spoilers on the Black Widow story if you follow this controversy el_bryanto May 2015 #30
I haven't seen it, but I will ismnotwasm May 2015 #48
Probably the only male in Hollywood that pays the SJWs more than lip service. LittleBlue May 2015 #34
Really? ismnotwasm May 2015 #51
Just seeing the pie fights here on DU shows that Joss Whedon is right. backscatter712 May 2015 #81
The creator of Buffy is sexist? kiva May 2015 #59
Yeah, I'm not understanding this hot mess at all. DeadLetterOffice May 2015 #62
I'm wondering how many people who are criticizing him kiva May 2015 #64
i havent seen any of them. i do not know the man or his history seabeyond May 2015 #66
I can't speak to the particular controversy kiva May 2015 #77
A pretty good starting place, considering the topic: JHB May 2015 #79
Joss Whedon has always been one of the good guys. backscatter712 May 2015 #82
Much ado about nothing. Comrade Grumpy May 2015 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Avengers Director: Rumor ...»Reply #19