Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He may be a great man and one I would support if he wins the primary but leftofcool May 2015 #1
Exactly. Why are those who love to scream the loudest how they are all about "issues" so concerned Number23 May 2015 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author 99Forever May 2015 #16
It's refreshing to see you are finally embracing your inner pragmatist. KittyWampus May 2015 #23
As usual, you are arguing about absolutely nothing and no one knows what you're babbling about Number23 May 2015 #30
I think perhaps this was in the wrong place. 99Forever May 2015 #31
You get what you give, hon. Number23 May 2015 #32
Right back atcha, hon. 99Forever May 2015 #33
Please see post #30. It is appropriate for just about everything you post on this board. Number23 May 2015 #34
Bye bye. 99Forever May 2015 #36
Finally. Number23 May 2015 #37
Politicians are meant to be smeared bigwillq May 2015 #2
Did he vote against the Brady Act or not? MineralMan May 2015 #3
It's like Hillary's IWR vote. People will hold it against them or they won't, Autumn May 2015 #4
Exactly. Candidates' records are matters of public record. MineralMan May 2015 #6
You are not ever going to find a perfect candidate who voted 100% the way you wanted them to. totodeinhere May 2015 #9
My goodness, that's hilarious treestar May 2015 #12
That is what I keep thinking... boston bean May 2015 #15
Not at all. I at least apply the same standard to all. I evaluate their overall positions on all of totodeinhere May 2015 #26
What rule are you referring to? Is there a rule that we can only support a candidate that we totodeinhere May 2015 #25
Many folks like simplicity...unfortunately, simple things usually aren't HereSince1628 May 2015 #20
Bumping and reposting your own thread again? nt onehandle May 2015 #7
Thanks For The Kick... Check The Date... No Reposting Here... WillyT May 2015 #8
I will say it again BrotherIvan May 2015 #10
probably not. He lives in a rural state & discusses his votes on guns = state issue. KittyWampus May 2015 #24
Perhaps, but I doubt he loves open carry and gun craziness that is going on in the rest of the BrotherIvan May 2015 #28
Why is it a "smear" to note what he voted on? treestar May 2015 #11
It's kind of hilarious isn't it. JoePhilly May 2015 #19
We should be proud he supports the most hated of our rights. ileus May 2015 #13
How are the facts about his voting record a smear? Renew Deal May 2015 #14
Bernie has been representing his constituents and many of them are people Vinca May 2015 #17
It's not a smear to truthfully expose a candidates views/votes SickOfTheOnePct May 2015 #18
Exactly, I probably vote Sanders in primary. But then I balance my idealism w/pragmatic. KittyWampus May 2015 #22
His actual record is not smearing him. FFS, is it so difficult to embrace pragmatism? KittyWampus May 2015 #21
OK, representing his constituency excuses a non-liberal vote! yallerdawg May 2015 #27
How do fear and shell shock justify invading a country that had no connection to 9/11 whatsoever? JVS May 2015 #35
Perfect! yallerdawg May 2015 #38
His gun record makes me like him more Telcontar May 2015 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For Those Attempting To S...»Reply #32