Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Guard tells Senator Boxer that she can't take notes on TPP [View all]Divernan
(15,480 posts)41. The Obama I voted for promised transparency and rule of law as touchstones
of his administration.
Unlike other offices within the White House, which were always exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, the Office of Administration responded to FOIA requests for 30 years. Until the Obama administration, watchdog groups on the left and the right used records from the office to shed light on how the White House works.
"This is an office that operated under the FOIA for 30 years, and when it became politically inconvenient, they decided they weren't subject to the Freedom of Information Act any more," said Tom Fitton of the conservative Judicial Watch
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/03/16/white-house-foia-regulations-deleted/24844253/
And it's not only FOIA requests directed to the White House which have been limited by Obama.
It's any requests on topics which included any communication with the White House. Well, that pretty much covers the water-front, doesn't it?
According to a 2009 memo from the White House Counsel to all agency heads and general counsels, the White House reminded all agencies to send FOIA requests containing White House equities to it for review.
The equities mandate applies to all documents and records, whether in oral, paper, or electronic form, that relate to communications to and from the White House, including preparations for such communications.
Transparency groups say the review process has significantly delayed some requests and that agencies do not have proper guidance on what counts as a White House equity.
Government watchdog group Cause of Action, one of the signers of the letter, first obtained the formerly secret 2009 memo. The group sued a dozen government agencies in August for more information on their White House equities policy.
And as Rep. Dennis Kucinich stated about Obama and the Rule of Law and drone strikes:
Think of the use of drone air strikes as summary executions, extra-judicial killings justified by faceless bureaucrats using who-knows-what "intelligence," with no oversight whatsoever and you get the idea that we have slipped into spooky new world where joystick gods manipulating robots deal death from the skies and then go home and hug their children. Everything America was once said to stand for: the rule of law, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights is in danger of becoming collateral damage as our fearful leaders continue to kill suspects and innocent alike, mindlessly unaware that the hellfire we are sowing will surely be reaped by Americans in the future. The proliferation of drone technology and its inevitable extension to civilian law enforcement is a leap into the arms of Big Brother.
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism recently estimated that at least 2,292 people have been killed by U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan since 2004. The Bureau determined that of that number, over 350 are civilians. A July 2009 Brookings Institution report stated ten civilians die for every one suspected militant from U.S. drone strikes. Yet another study by the New American Foundation concluded that out of 114 drone attacks in Pakistan, at least 32% of those killed by the strikes were civilians.
President Obama has greatly expanded the use of drones over the past several years, authorizing more drone strikes during his first fifteen months in office than President Bush did during the entirety of his eight years in office. In addition to the use of drones in Pakistan, the Administration has authorized strikes in Yemen and Somalia. The increasing reliance on drones and the lack of recourse for the families of innocent civilians that are killed by such strikes demonstrate the impunity with which the U.S. uses this technology.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-dennis-kucinich/drones-direct-hit-upon-ru_b_929203.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If the TPP passes, is there any conceivable way it can be challenged/rolled-back?
erronis
May 2015
#84
Yes! A senatorial arrest or two for taking notes could make clear what's going on.
hedda_foil
May 2015
#35
I dont know who they are, but I do know that this president has been obstructed unlike any
randys1
May 2015
#28
Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government;
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2015
#21
This must be a pack of lies! Right here on DU I have been told by several members that
A Simple Game
May 2015
#24
Congress did not have access to FDR's trade negotiations nor Obama's Iranian negotiations.
pampango
May 2015
#39
If confidential international negotiations are 'wrong', we'll have to come up with another method
pampango
May 2015
#43
But but but ..I just read on the White House website that Obama runs the most transparent in history
LiberalLovinLug
May 2015
#86
Do we know who the people are who are negotiating, and ARE allowed to look at it?
arcane1
May 2015
#51
nothing is safe that does not show how it can bear discussion and publicity. Lord Acton
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2015
#54
"What ya in for, kid?" "Taking illegal notes". And they all moved away from her on the bench...n/t
jtuck004
May 2015
#58
This is Bullshit Bullshit Bullshit. People need to wake up. What is so damn secret that they don't
YOHABLO
May 2015
#60
play the two level game, Mr. President. Stop acting like some shady prick.
Ed Suspicious
May 2015
#62
Boxer was my Senator for many years, and my quess is she didn't quite believe or grasp what
libdem4life
May 2015
#64
Here is what is wrong - if it is not finished, then why the rush to have Fast Track?
djean111
May 2015
#78