Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The staged performance and then the betrayal [View all]F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)8. Exactly.
Let's do that. I'd be happy to meet up with people in Washington.
Direct action scares the hell out of the elite. Part of why it does here:
Ill begin with the more general topic of class struggle over the use of outdoor space. This is a very consequential issue for workers and the poor. The outdoors is important to workers
for work
for leisure and entertainment
for living space, if you dont have a home
and for politics.
First, about work. While successful merchants could control indoor spaces, those without so many means had to set themselves up as vendors on the street. The established merchants saw them as competitors and got the police to remove them.
Street vendors are also effective purveyors of stolen goods because theyre mobile and anonymous. It wasnt just pickpockets and burglars who made use of street vendors this way. The servants and slaves of the middle class also stole from their masters and passed the goods on to the local vendors. (By the way, New York City had slavery until 1827.) The leakage of wealth out of the citys comfortable homes is another reason that the middle class demanded action against street vendors.
The street was also simply where workers would spend their free timebecause their homes were not comfortable. The street was a place where they could get friendship and free entertainment, and, depending on the place and time, they might engage in dissident religion or politics. British Marxist historian EP Thompson summed all this up when he wrote that 19th century English police were impartial, attempting to sweep off the streets with an equable hand street traders, beggars, prostitutes, street-entertainers, pickets, children playing football and freethinking and socialist speakers alike. The pretext very often was that a complaint of interruption of trade had been received from a shopkeeper.
On both sides of the Atlantic, most arrests were related to victimless crimes, or crimes against the public order. Another Marxist historian Sidney Harring noted: The criminologists definition of public order crimes comes perilously close to the historians description of working-class leisure-time activity.
Outdoor life wasand isespecially important to working-class politics. Established politicians and corporate managers can meet indoors and make decisions that have big consequences because these people are in command of bureaucracies and workforces. But when working people meet and make decisions about how to change things, it usually doesnt count for much unless they can gather some supporters out on the street, whether its for a strike or a demonstration. The street is the proving ground for much of working-class politics, and the ruling class is fully aware of that. Thats why they put the police on the street as a counter-force whenever the working class shows its strength.
for work
for leisure and entertainment
for living space, if you dont have a home
and for politics.
First, about work. While successful merchants could control indoor spaces, those without so many means had to set themselves up as vendors on the street. The established merchants saw them as competitors and got the police to remove them.
Street vendors are also effective purveyors of stolen goods because theyre mobile and anonymous. It wasnt just pickpockets and burglars who made use of street vendors this way. The servants and slaves of the middle class also stole from their masters and passed the goods on to the local vendors. (By the way, New York City had slavery until 1827.) The leakage of wealth out of the citys comfortable homes is another reason that the middle class demanded action against street vendors.
The street was also simply where workers would spend their free timebecause their homes were not comfortable. The street was a place where they could get friendship and free entertainment, and, depending on the place and time, they might engage in dissident religion or politics. British Marxist historian EP Thompson summed all this up when he wrote that 19th century English police were impartial, attempting to sweep off the streets with an equable hand street traders, beggars, prostitutes, street-entertainers, pickets, children playing football and freethinking and socialist speakers alike. The pretext very often was that a complaint of interruption of trade had been received from a shopkeeper.
On both sides of the Atlantic, most arrests were related to victimless crimes, or crimes against the public order. Another Marxist historian Sidney Harring noted: The criminologists definition of public order crimes comes perilously close to the historians description of working-class leisure-time activity.
Outdoor life wasand isespecially important to working-class politics. Established politicians and corporate managers can meet indoors and make decisions that have big consequences because these people are in command of bureaucracies and workforces. But when working people meet and make decisions about how to change things, it usually doesnt count for much unless they can gather some supporters out on the street, whether its for a strike or a demonstration. The street is the proving ground for much of working-class politics, and the ruling class is fully aware of that. Thats why they put the police on the street as a counter-force whenever the working class shows its strength.
http://socialistworker.org/blog/critical-reading/2014/12/09/main-role-police-protecting-ca
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
221 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Those who vote for this will be rewarded by the beneficiaries of this atrocious
sabrina 1
May 2015
#5
The party isn't gonna change. Period. At least not in your lifetime, or the next one.
jtuck004
May 2015
#14
"The love of money is the root of all evil" < That explains a lot of our problems. n/t
jtuck004
May 2015
#184
'Religion" is not used as a deity construct, it is being used as a belief in what used to be the
djean111
May 2015
#28
This is too important to play dimwitted "let's get a post locked" games.
DisgustipatedinCA
May 2015
#30
Losing one's religion is just a saying, it has nothing to do with organized religion/deities.
cui bono
May 2015
#114
I've been afk a bit, what have I missed, what is this in reference to?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
May 2015
#15
Actually, I'm guessing at that part because the information I've seen is sketchy.
randome
May 2015
#36
That's it. I knew I had it wrong but I wasn't able to find the posts for it. Thanks.
randome
May 2015
#43
A lot of the Dems who voted against the TPP fast tracking reversed their votes, so now
Nay
May 2015
#34
Agree. Protecting human rights as well as corporate rights is not anti free trade.
think
May 2015
#33
I'm waiting for a single BOG er to wake the hell up and admit what this president has done
Doctor_J
May 2015
#86
They insult the very people who put them in office. Why do they even bother to hide this
Elwood P Dowd
May 2015
#140
At the end of "Joe's Garage," Joe - who only ever wanted to play guitar - has been stripped of
RadiationTherapy
May 2015
#208
Here is the greatest example of the point and one of Frank's most exquisite works.
RadiationTherapy
May 2015
#210
I had hoped my anger over this outragous betrayal would have subsided somewhat by now.
99Forever
May 2015
#193