Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: MATT TAIBBI: The Democratic Party Would TRIANGULATE Its Own Mother [View all]Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)33. This is bad politics as well as bad governance, as shown by the 2009 congressional profile compared
to the current one. The party apparatchik has managed to play on the personality cult, giving us the brilliant, energetic, handsome, affable black man in 2008 and the brilliant, experienced woman for 2016. And we get "D" presidents to sign off on a republican agenda. Yippee.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
128 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yep, Taibbi is a master at crafting stories he knows a certain segment wants to hear.
stevenleser
May 2015
#17
Yes, sadly Taibbi's articles are slanted in a certain direction. The sad part is they
A Simple Game
May 2015
#19
No, they are not slanted towards the truth. All you need to know about him is found
stevenleser
May 2015
#20
For you there is only one problem with his agenda, it doesn't fit yours. n/t
A Simple Game
May 2015
#23
No, the reverse. The only reason you aren't analyzing his writing is it perfectly dovetails with
stevenleser
May 2015
#26
Well to be honest my second excerpt is subjective, but I challenge you to
A Simple Game
May 2015
#32
I'll do a search and find that post by the DUer that was at an event he completely mischaracterized.
stevenleser
May 2015
#62
And of course when proof is provided, you throw out ad-hominems and then beg out of the
stevenleser
May 2015
#71
Oh I've answered your challenges and then some. The guy can't be trusted to tell the truth.
stevenleser
May 2015
#75
Do you even pay attention to what you link to or are you just going for volume?
A Simple Game
May 2015
#72
So you are acknowledging he lied up a storm in 2003, 2004 and 2009 but think he suddenly stopped
stevenleser
May 2015
#73
Its fair to say you did acknowledge it & It's the same generalized sneer at and smear of Democrats.
stevenleser
May 2015
#79
Warren was nothng in 03....& Obama didn't come onto the scene until 04....
Historic NY
May 2015
#101
I totally agree. And I love the idea that it backfired. The unions and many of us were very angry
jwirr
May 2015
#43
Amazing the regressives that come out of the woodwork on the attack of those who speak out
newthinking
May 2015
#97
I think the Populist Movement will grow. Obama may get his job killing wish and
rhett o rick
May 2015
#100
Triangulation does more harm than good. The conservatives have the right idea.
A Simple Game
May 2015
#120
Matt Taibbi is one of the most honest reporters in this country today. Naturally he is despised
sabrina 1
May 2015
#28
He is Carlin without the funny. Tells the truth, the whole truth and little else.
randys1
May 2015
#53
Anyone who has been telling the truth over the past decade or so, instantly becomes a target
sabrina 1
May 2015
#58
You make a good point. And to be honest, many of us while watching these smear campaigns
sabrina 1
May 2015
#119
There is little we can do, but one thing we can do is to not allow good people to be smeared on
sabrina 1
May 2015
#126
Notice that one truth teller after another has been been trashed in washington (and on this forum)
newthinking
May 2015
#98
The difference is, he completely mischaracterizes events to fit that agenda.
stevenleser
May 2015
#60
You will of course post information on the event with details and post Taibbi's article so WE
sabrina 1
May 2015
#102
triangulation has traditionally pointed right because it's been used on more conservative opponents.
HereSince1628
May 2015
#14
Yes, but that's sort'a the problem of relying on a tactic rather than a strategy..
HereSince1628
May 2015
#94
Agreed, and we can admire and support Obama AND simultaneously acknowledge he is
randys1
May 2015
#56
About Triangulation- if you are opposing a strong force, the only way to move forward
KittyWampus
May 2015
#16
No matter what the President does, he will never get the Republicans to love him.
corkhead
May 2015
#18
I don't get it - Obama gets bashed for criticizing Warren, but Warren skates for criticizing Obama??
George II
May 2015
#22
Or, Obama gets bashed for siding with the billionaires and transnationals, and Warren "skates"
Doctor_J
May 2015
#29
Obama called Warren "flat out wrong." So *exactly* what did she get wrong?
magical thyme
May 2015
#30
Up until he started attacking her she was attacking the TPP. Or at least that is the way I see it.
jwirr
May 2015
#49
RS destroyed itself with that one: everyone knows it's structured like HuffPo so the
MisterP
May 2015
#68
This is bad politics as well as bad governance, as shown by the 2009 congressional profile compared
Doctor_J
May 2015
#33
Democratic Party would hire some child labor in Vietnam to triangulate its own mother...
whereisjustice
May 2015
#38
My God! I think you are right, it's so obvious when you see it in black and white.
A Simple Game
May 2015
#50
One of the most powerful tools FDR gave us to make sure we never had another Great Depression
jwirr
May 2015
#52
Yes, Obama has shown plenty of evidence of his vindictive, short-tempered manner.
randome
May 2015
#118