General Discussion

Marr

(20,317 posts)

3. Hillary Clinton isn't a Barrack Obama either.

Fri May 15, 2015, 01:33 PM

May 2015

She's just got a massive pile of corporate cash. He was the corporate candidate, too, of course-- but there's no denying the man has tremendous charisma and skill as a politician.

I can't even express how pitiful it is that Hillary Clinton is openly regarded as 'the only viable candidate', solely because she's got the support of Wall Street.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Harry Reid: Hillary Clinton "has a clear field"...."right now we have Hillary Clinton and that's it" [View all] Cali_Democrat May 2015 OP

Harry has ignored other progressive candidates. It doesn't surprise me in the least.... think May 2015 #1

So have most Democrats NobodyHere May 2015 #13

It's the same mistake he made in 2008. He pledged his Exilednight May 2015 #41

Lol whatever whatchamacallit May 2015 #2

Don't most polls currently show Hillary taking the Dem nomination handily? Cali_Democrat May 2015 #12

Most of the polled don't yet know the other candidates from Adam whatchamacallit May 2015 #14

Here's to a great campaign season! Cali_Democrat May 2015 #16

On this whatchamacallit May 2015 #17

Hillary Clinton isn't a Barrack Obama either. Marr May 2015 #3

Bernie Sanders isn't a Barack Obama either... brooklynite May 2015 #5

You're right. Sanders is honest. Marr May 2015 #7

To paraphrase a comment from 2008...she's charismatic enough brooklynite May 2015 #8

Wall Street certainly seems to think so. /nt Marr May 2015 #9

...and so do 18 million Democratic voters... brooklynite May 2015 #28

Yep, she's inevitable. Again. Marr May 2015 #29

its because people like you eloydude May 2015 #39

No, I'm definitely Center... brooklynite May 2015 #40

Well you are supporting someone whos to the right of Obama eloydude May 2015 #42

Other than the IWR, name an issue where they differ significantly. brooklynite May 2015 #43

That is disingenuous AJH032 May 2015 #20

I kept hearing that, but here is the only place... daleanime May 2015 #26

This site is literally the only place I encounter enthusiastic Hillary supporters. Marr May 2015 #30

wait, you mean Bernie isn't running? O'Malley isn't scheduled to announce? cali May 2015 #4

No, he's saying they're not consequential candidates. brooklynite May 2015 #6

wow. you parsed out that's what he was saying all on your own? cali May 2015 #22

Reid would enjoy a lack of debate mylye2222 May 2015 #10

Talk about Democrats eating their own bigwillq May 2015 #11

Yeah, the hypocrite, Sherrod Brown, comes to mind. Cha May 2015 #31

Congressional leaders failed to give appropriate opportunities daredtowork May 2015 #15

He couldn't be more correct. Hillary's only "serious" challengers would be 2nd or 3rd tier tritsofme May 2015 #18

There's an all-star alright. Her first name is Elizabeth. hedda_foil May 2015 #19

Who's this "we" he speaks of? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2015 #21

HR is right. Jamaal510 May 2015 #23

So does Harry expect the primary debate to have only Hillary in it? rock May 2015 #24

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words May 2015 #25

+ AtomicKitten May 2015 #38

We have the Silent Corporate Champion, aspirant May 2015 #27

That statement is going to piss a few off. hrmjustin May 2015 #32

What Reid said is just plain rude and condescending. Been enough of that in our party. madfloridian May 2015 #33

Wire service? Plagarism? Three articles, two bylines, 3 time stamps or 3 time zones? Cerridwen May 2015 #34

No more all-stars!! pity nt fadedrose May 2015 #35

"The Rundown with Jos� D�az-Balart"? KamaAina May 2015 #36

The fix is in. Nuclear Unicorn May 2015 #37