Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DP for the Boston Bomber. [View all]catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)18. Part of empaneling the Jury was asking if they could support a death penalty...
...a "no" would mean dismissal.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He was more than a murderer, he was a terrorist, who tried to mass kill a lot of people
still_one
May 2015
#29
Murder is, by definition, unlawful. This case will culminate in a lawful execution.
NotoriousRBG
May 2015
#37
Good point. Death penalty is like guns, belief in god, evolution eventually resolves
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#53
Exposes....how? In what way? What do you mean? Please explain. Thank you. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2015
#20
I don't base my core beliefs on what other people do. So while I do oppose the DP
KittyWampus
May 2015
#40
I am surprised. As I understand it, it had to be unanimous. I thought sure a few would
Hoyt
May 2015
#10
Part of empaneling the Jury was asking if they could support a death penalty...
catnhatnh
May 2015
#18
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster.
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2015
#43