General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Not since LBJ [View all]cascadiance
(19,537 posts)If Hillary were truly coming out and pushing against the TPP the way Elizabeth Warren has that has had even president Obama publicly criticize her, the media would be all over it. She HAS NOT come out against Fast Track and TPP.
Having miscellaneous comments about her having reservations about ISDS provisions is about the only thing I've heard. If she really is against the ISDS, and wants to fight to get it out of the TPP, then she should be fighting AGAINST Fast Track that would have the whole TPP shut down in order to get rid of ISDS if that bill is passed. If she sees any value to the TPP, but is truly against ISDS provisions, she should want to shut down Fast Track, or if she is against all of the TPP, then she should also want to shut down Fast Track. If she doesn't want to support what Republicans in lock step have wanted in the Senate, she should also be against Fast Track.
Oh, something we don't know about where perhaps ISDS is being removed from the TPP as her only objection to it so that she can support Fast Track secretly the way this treaty is being negotiated has her justified in not saying anything?
For me, and so many other Americans, having a public process where we know where critical laws are being negotiated and what is being negotiated with whom, so that we can advise our "representatives" is a key part of a democratic system. Politicians that don't understand this in my book don't believe in democracy, and DO NOT DESERVE OUR VOTE!