General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Not since LBJ [View all]cascadiance
(19,537 posts)WHERE are your documents to back that statement up? They don't exist?
Does Hillary Clinton agree with Senator Warren that Fast Track treaty should be voted down? I would argue that she hasn't shown that she agrees with Warren on this. For you to establish your argument, you need to point to a post that shows that just like Warren, she's against Fast Track Authority being passed. You can't, and that is why you CANNOT SHOW that she agrees with Warren on this. Maybe she secretly does, but not publicly. Otherwise, like I noted, the media would be all over it. They AREN'T!
You and others were wanting to claim that Hillary Clinton was wanting to "gut punch Republicans" more than other candidates like Bernie would. I was simply giving you a place that is topical now that she could, but she's chosen to take a stance that shows no interest in providing any kind of leadership in establishing whether she views America should approve or disapprove of the Fast Track and TPP bills. For me, if she were to take a stance on that, that would "gut punch" the Republicans that are for this bill, and show that she's willing to do so and stand up for the American people even if it means her taking sides against Obama, who is showing through this process that he is taking sides against the American people in wanting to push this through secretly. And that would also show that she would be better than Obama in "gut punching them" where on this issue he has "negotiated" with them where he shouldn't be. Show that she is different and can work for us rather than corporate America in the ways Republicans want us to!