Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

blindpig

(11,292 posts)
Sat Dec 24, 2011, 08:28 AM Dec 2011

No More “Green Capitalism”, An assessment of the failure of the Durban summit on the climate [View all]


No More “Green Capitalism”, An assessment of the failure of the Durban summit on the climate

Josep Maria Antentas & Esther Vivas

We will save the markets, not the climate. That is how we can summarize the outcome of the 17th Conference of Parties (COP17) to the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCC) which took place in Durban, South Africa between 28 November and 10 December 2011. There is a striking contrast between the rapid response by governments and international institutions at the onset of the economic and financial crisis of 2007-08 in bailing out private banks with public money and the complete immobility they demonstrate in response to climate change. Yet this should not surprise us, because in both cases it is the markets and their accomplices in government who come out as winners.

There were two central themes at the Durban summit; first, the future of the Kyoto Protocol which expires in 2012 and the ability to put in place mechanisms to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and, secondly, the launch of the Green Climate Fund approved at the previous summit in Cancun (Mexico) with the theoretical aim of supporting the poorest countries to face the consequences of climate change through projects of mitigation and adaptation.

After Durban, we can say that a second phase of the Kyoto Protocol remains empty of content. They postponed any real action until 2020 and ruled out any binding regulations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It was the representatives of the most polluting countries, headed by the United States, who argued for an agreement based on voluntary reductions and opposed any binding mechanism. The Kyoto Protocol was already inadequate, and its strict application would lead to a small slowdown of global warming. But now we are on a path that can only make the situation much worse.

With regard to the Green Climate Fund, as a first step, rich countries pledged to contribute up to $ 30 billion in 2012 and 100 billion per year until 2020. In the first place these amounts are insufficient. Further, no source of public funds has been identified. Therefore, the doors are wide open to private investment run by the World Bank. As has already been noted by social movements, this is a strategy to “transform the Green Climate Fund into a greedy employers’ fund”. Once again they are making profits from the climate crisis and environmental pollution (investment banks have already developed a range of financial instruments to intervene in what is called the carbon market, emissions, etc.)

more.......

http://esthervivas.wordpress.com/english/no-more-green-capitalism/
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Must Watch: The Amazing Empowering Voice of Youth at Durban SpiralHawk Dec 2011 #1
Thanks for the inspiration. Magoo48 Dec 2011 #4
It is amazingly resonant, isn't it? SpiralHawk Dec 2011 #5
The UN's push for an eco-fascist world government is what prevented the adoption of a sensible Bogart Dec 2011 #2
so capitalist's interests had nothing to do with it? blindpig Dec 2011 #3
Well, the West is capitalist and they (we) are interested in surviving; Bogart Dec 2011 #10
"We?" blindpig Dec 2011 #14
Nonsense, capitalism facilitated the evolution of the most advanced civilizations in the history of Bogart Dec 2011 #15
Yes, it has.... blindpig Dec 2011 #17
Post removed Post removed Dec 2011 #19
Using anti-capitalist propaganda does not make one a socialist. blindpig Dec 2011 #21
For the mass of people, capitalism was slightly better than feudalism socialist_n_TN Dec 2011 #23
Can you provide a link to back up your assertion? lunatica Dec 2011 #6
That depends heavily on what is being said ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2011 #8
http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/awglca14/eng/crp38.pdf Bogart Dec 2011 #12
I don't get the paranoia about the UN pushing whatever people seem to fear. lunatica Dec 2011 #16
The key difference was that instead of "going direct" the UN was going to broker things heavily ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2011 #18
That was some of the objections ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2011 #7
By and large.... blindpig Dec 2011 #9
Do you have a link? lunatica Dec 2011 #11
According to the draft, the aim was to create a "legally-binding instrument/outcome". Bogart Dec 2011 #13
Oh noes, teh scary UN black helicopters!!! Odin2005 Dec 2011 #26
The US is stuck on stupid... no INSANE upi402 Dec 2011 #20
There ain't no "green" capitalism. Just like there ain't no socialist_n_TN Dec 2011 #22
Big problem with the environmental movement.... blindpig Dec 2011 #24
That's actually the big problem with ALL of the single issue socialist_n_TN Dec 2011 #28
Yes, indeed. blindpig Dec 2011 #29
Amen to all this. Starry Messenger Dec 2011 #25
Green Capitalism is an oxymoron. Odin2005 Dec 2011 #27
kick blindpig Dec 2011 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No More “Green Capitalism...