Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
2. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but in another thread someone pointed out that
Fri May 22, 2015, 11:33 AM
May 2015

at the time he was 12 or so, and at least one of the girls was around 5.

If that's true, that's a darn site different than your brother and his girlfriend 'fondling one another'.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

yous trollin aikoaiko May 2015 #1
Yep! Tom Ripley May 2015 #5
I don't know enough about it to be sure, but in another thread someone pointed out that Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #2
5 years old?! Now that is sick BUT the report I saw was that the girls and Josh were around his age diabeticman May 2015 #3
The girls were 12, 11, 10, 8 and 5 years old. This wasn't just some "doctor game" riderinthestorm May 2015 #8
He was 14. The youngest victim was 4. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #4
See today is the first I'm hearing about a 4 or 5 year old victim. diabeticman May 2015 #12
Now that you mention it, I'm not sure how this story got out in the first place n/t arcane1 May 2015 #6
This is purely a guess on my part. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #10
Apparently there was a FOIA request made. The evidence found in the book haikugal May 2015 #18
There is a difference in a boy and girlfriend fondling at fourteen and a fourteen fondling younger Thinkingabout May 2015 #7
I agree on that. But some of the reports I saw yesterday said it was girls around his age not a 4 diabeticman May 2015 #9
The next daughter was 2 years younger making her 12, it was wrong. I do not ever buy the argument Thinkingabout May 2015 #17
I guess I'll be the first here to answer your actual question, diabeticman: NYC_SKP May 2015 #11
In 2002, he was 14. In 2006, he was 18. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #13
I was kind of shocked to learn that the statute of limitations had run out on some of this. NYC_SKP May 2015 #15
I don't follow them either, but I was able to gather this from the police report. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #16
my wife friend just e-mailed her saying she figured out which sister it was. diabeticman May 2015 #23
Thanksand I am sorry I didn't know all facts. Going after a 4 or 5 year old... just sick. diabeticman May 2015 #14
The kid was a sick little shit. MineralMan May 2015 #19
Incest is no excuse for sexual abuse of a child. In_The_Wind May 2015 #20
I'm going to take a wild guess here...I'd bet that letter was put there on purpose by one of the libdem4life May 2015 #21
I read somewhere the letter was written by a parent or friend of the molested child who polly7 May 2015 #22
Actually, that would make more sense. Again, a victim of family incest is almost never libdem4life May 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can I just say without be...»Reply #2