Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
10. This is purely a guess on my part.
Fri May 22, 2015, 11:45 AM
May 2015

19 kids is a lot of kids. Not all of them are going to want to tow that "morally superior" line. A letter was left in a book at the church about it and was found by another churchgoer. Those accusations were later forwarded to Harpo Productions who in turn, contacted authorities...

An investigation began and was ended because the statute of limitations had expired.

My (purely) imagination has me thinking it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to think about a very young girl being extremely angry over what happened to her and the fact that no steps were taken to punish the offender.

Again, that's just my thoughts/guess.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

yous trollin aikoaiko May 2015 #1
Yep! Tom Ripley May 2015 #5
I don't know enough about it to be sure, but in another thread someone pointed out that Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #2
5 years old?! Now that is sick BUT the report I saw was that the girls and Josh were around his age diabeticman May 2015 #3
The girls were 12, 11, 10, 8 and 5 years old. This wasn't just some "doctor game" riderinthestorm May 2015 #8
He was 14. The youngest victim was 4. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #4
See today is the first I'm hearing about a 4 or 5 year old victim. diabeticman May 2015 #12
Now that you mention it, I'm not sure how this story got out in the first place n/t arcane1 May 2015 #6
This is purely a guess on my part. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #10
Apparently there was a FOIA request made. The evidence found in the book haikugal May 2015 #18
There is a difference in a boy and girlfriend fondling at fourteen and a fourteen fondling younger Thinkingabout May 2015 #7
I agree on that. But some of the reports I saw yesterday said it was girls around his age not a 4 diabeticman May 2015 #9
The next daughter was 2 years younger making her 12, it was wrong. I do not ever buy the argument Thinkingabout May 2015 #17
I guess I'll be the first here to answer your actual question, diabeticman: NYC_SKP May 2015 #11
In 2002, he was 14. In 2006, he was 18. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #13
I was kind of shocked to learn that the statute of limitations had run out on some of this. NYC_SKP May 2015 #15
I don't follow them either, but I was able to gather this from the police report. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #16
my wife friend just e-mailed her saying she figured out which sister it was. diabeticman May 2015 #23
Thanksand I am sorry I didn't know all facts. Going after a 4 or 5 year old... just sick. diabeticman May 2015 #14
The kid was a sick little shit. MineralMan May 2015 #19
Incest is no excuse for sexual abuse of a child. In_The_Wind May 2015 #20
I'm going to take a wild guess here...I'd bet that letter was put there on purpose by one of the libdem4life May 2015 #21
I read somewhere the letter was written by a parent or friend of the molested child who polly7 May 2015 #22
Actually, that would make more sense. Again, a victim of family incest is almost never libdem4life May 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can I just say without be...»Reply #10