Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)

24. Should I point to the post that initiated that view?

Reply to cyberswede (Reply #21)

Mon May 25, 2015, 05:23 PM

May 2015

It is just above my answer

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This place can be hysterical at times [View all] nadinbrzezinski May 2015 OP

"So with that, let the alerts come and the inevitable lock." Martyr, much? Electric Monk May 2015 #1

It's a statement of fact nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #3

There Goes The Neighborhood seveneyes May 2015 #2

It would go if we had a neighborhood to begin with nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #4

So what's your position on wind power etc now? ret5hd May 2015 #5

And that came from left field but expectd nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #8

We don't seem to mind PNAC as long as they are newthinking May 2015 #6

Good post malaise May 2015 #10

We agree nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #11

+1 liberal_at_heart May 2015 #14

Good post. sabrina 1 May 2015 #31

why not just opine on those issues and let it go at that bigtree May 2015 #7

How about the present ones? nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #9

Is there really a dearth of posts about the present administration? bigtree May 2015 #15

Try to keep up nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #18

bigtree doesn't hate history - not sure why you think he does. cyberswede May 2015 #21

Should I point to the post that initiated that view? nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #24

I read that post. Nowhere does he suggest he hates history. cyberswede May 2015 #26

The tone was that we shoudl not talk of dead presidents nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #28

... cwydro May 2015 #23

If your talking about NAFTA, 2008 BAIL-OUT, and the TPP, yes all orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #12

I was specifically referring to the GWOT, but NAFTA is the same story nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #19

I understand the frustration that serious policy issues often get ignored. I get frustrated that liberal_at_heart May 2015 #13

+ 1000 !!! orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #16

And in that you are correct the broad brush is nasty nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #20

what's so amazing about those emails? zappaman May 2015 #17

I will but not here nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #22

Oh, come on! If the clues are free, just keep giving us more of them! randome May 2015 #32

Sorry I have concluded that policy is not the DU shtick nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #34

so you gripe that no one is talking about those "treasure troves" of info demtenjeep May 2015 #33

I don't care to engage in the Dugger discussions but why knock those who do? cali May 2015 #25

I am statng my view nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #27

You can start threads on the "important stuff" tammywammy May 2015 #29

As I stated nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #30

You're assuming I don't care about child abuse and injustice tammywammy May 2015 #35

Locking thread. TexasTowelie May 2015 #36